On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
> >> executed inside of a mock-environ
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be
> >> easily
> >> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
> >
> > Not to mention
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>>
>> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
>> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
>
> Not to mention that running extensive
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
Not to mention that running extensive test suites for every build will
put strain on our build infras
On 04/27/2012 02:11 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
I wonder how different a run-time test-suite dffers from a test suite to
be executed during build.
There are 2 major differences:
1. The package-to-test itself is not installed to its final destination.
2. A testsuite being run in %check has acce
On 27/04/12 13:57, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A wrong approach?
>
> Why do you insist on using the %check section for that? It's a build-time
> feature, found only in the spec file and not packaged in the built rpms
> (also due to the test data I've referred to above).
>
I'm asking if the scripts
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:04:56 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
> On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
> > buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
> > won't be available.
> >
> We encourag
On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
> buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
> won't be available.
>
We encourage our packagers to implement useful check-sections.
To make an example,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:10:11 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just a half-baked idea, I'm carrying some time with me around.
>
> Some packages have a check-section being executed during build. Would it
> make sense to execute that test, when required packages of that package
> get updated (
