Re: TC1 et al.

2013-03-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:49:44 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > WINE program loader is still broken. How to understand that comment correctly? Why do you write "still"? Have you reported the problem and the ticket in the bug tracker has been closed but the problem persists? -- Fedora

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On 05/02/12 00:43, Adam Williamson wrote: The switch back to Rawhide? ? Not sure what you mean. That means that when you do an upgrade with boot.iso, it will be using the post-/usr move packages. That's what I meant. boot.iso pulls in Rawhide I'm not sure what's the status on adding the

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:16 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 04/02/12 17:07, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I don't think any code has yet been added to anaconda to do the /usr > > move preparation stuff on upgrade; so it seems quite likely that > > the /usr move is the source of the problem here. >

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Frank Murphy
On 04/02/12 17:07, Adam Williamson wrote: I don't think any code has yet been added to anaconda to do the /usr move preparation stuff on upgrade; so it seems quite likely that the /usr move is the source of the problem here. The switch back to Rawhide? -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fed

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Frank Murphy
On 04/02/12 17:08, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: Looking at the test matrix. Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16. There's eight 'upgrade' tests, all at the very bottom of the whole matrix. duh! Just looked at the boot.iso bit. -- Rega

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > Looking at the test matrix. > Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16. There's eight 'upgrade' tests, all at the very bottom of the whole matrix. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 15:45 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 04/02/12 15:37, Mike Chambers wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > >> Looking at the test matrix. > >> Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16. > >> Which it did sucessfully. > >> > >> and it reboot to F

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Frank Murphy
On 04/02/12 15:37, Mike Chambers wrote: On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: Looking at the test matrix. Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16. Which it did sucessfully. and it reboot to F17 kernel. The /usr move stuff didn't cause any problems when you did the upgrad

Re: TC1 netinstall.iso Clarify Test ug from F16?

2012-02-04 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > Looking at the test matrix. > Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16. > Which it did sucessfully. > > and it reboot to F17 kernel. The /usr move stuff didn't cause any problems when you did the upgrade? Was that through the installer

Re: TC1

2011-03-30 Thread A.J. Werkman
This is already filed: Bug #692196 Koos Op 30-3-2011 21:47, Adam Williamson schreef: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:35 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: Manual disk setup with basic video was nominal except that I was unable to enter a static IP during install as the address field went blan

Re: TC1

2011-03-30 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/30/2011 07:35 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > No wonder > OpenSuse and Ubuntu are looking for something else. Do you got some referrense backing that up with regards to OpenSuse? Just a bit curios given that the upstream Gnome3 releases are OpenSuse and hosted [1] @ OpenSuse JBG

Re: TC1

2011-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:35 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Manual disk setup with basic video was nominal except that > I was unable to enter a static IP during install as the address > field went blank as soon as I entered an address. Is there a reason you chose basic video? Did you

Re: TC1 torrent?

2010-10-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On 10/29/10 1:35 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 13:26:53 -0430, >Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On 10/29/10 12:06 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430, >>>Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail

Re: TC1 torrent?

2010-10-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 13:26:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 10/29/10 12:06 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430, > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >>Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail-slow. Has anyone put up > >>a torrent yet or do I hav

Re: TC1 torrent?

2010-10-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On 10/29/10 12:06 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430, >Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail-slow. Has anyone put up >> a torrent yet or do I have to bide my time till the official release? I >> was hoping to do the updat

Re: TC1 torrent?

2010-10-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail-slow. Has anyone put up > a torrent yet or do I have to bide my time till the official release? I > was hoping to do the update this weekend. I think you would do better to jus