On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Role installation
>
> For at least F22, do we need to have a criterion for installing
> new roles
> with rolekit? Or will "brought to a working configuration" cover
> this enough?
So looking at this as I add the server role requiremen
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 09:43 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good idea to me. Do we have a "phase out" SOP
> somewhere for criteria? I'm not finding it readily on the wiki if
> it's there.
We don't, but indeed it does sound like a good idea for things we're
just 'aging out'. T
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:38:55PM +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>Kickstart Delivery
> >>>
> >>> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
> >>>supported
> >>> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or d
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:21:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> > Greetings testers!
> >
> > While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> > some cleanup
> > opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd e
On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Kickstart Delivery
>
> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
>supported
> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or do we still
>actively test
> using a diskette for ks delivery?
Hum, not sure. I know I have
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Greetings testers!
>
> While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> some cleanup
> opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd email the
> list before
> making any changes.
>
> Beta
>
>
> Package s
