>
> On 04/04/2014 04:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Does this look OK to everyone? Thanks!
I think it does. We can consider whether we want to check mainly Alpha test
cases for Rawhide (possibly removing all other ones from the matrix), or at
least recommend those to be prioritized in the de
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 07:00 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 04:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Does this look OK to everyone? Thanks!
>
> Is not better to have this separated/sorted by milestones (
> alpha/beta/final)
Well, the tests within each table are usually ordered
On 04/04/2014 04:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Does this look OK to everyone? Thanks!
Is not better to have this separated/sorted by milestones (
alpha/beta/final) as well as aligned with Mike's test maps?
And this probably should also be tagged with what's applicable to each
workgroup so
