On 2/14/20 10:08, Kamil Paral wrote:
We do have the test case for Core Applications and the ones for Browser
and Terminal. Software even gets a tryout for updating. Question is: Is
this sufficient?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_workstation_core_applications is
just about a few ap
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:51 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> > (and looking at>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test , it
> seems
> > we don't even have one, because what we usually do is to thoughtlessly
> > perform some of those extra graphical steps, like openin
On 2/10/20 09:45, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
That's why I kept asking
whether you'd like to create a test case tailored to GUI installation
workflows (and looking at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test , it se
On 2/10/20 09:45, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I thought the best way to see if the install went well was to see if the
application would start and close.
I think the major difference is that you keep thinking in terms of
applications (icon
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> I thought the best way to see if the install went well was to see if the
> application would start and close.
I think the major difference is that you keep thinking in terms of
applications (icons in menus, open and close), while I t
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 11:53 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> In retrospect my initial thinking on this test case was erroneous.
> Most
>
> of my carrer was spent making sure the documents I wrote were as
>
> comprehensive as possible and left little to doubt. I'm getting used
> to
>
> ho
On 2/7/20 10:31, Kamil Paral wrote:
So we're slowly getting back to the original version of the test case. It
still contains instructions to check that applications start correctly,
which I believe is not the point of the test case.
I can certainly see that
It's missing
verification via rp
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:02 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
>
>
> > I believe the purpose of the test case is to have a very generic test
> case
> > that works in all environments (not just graphical ones) and applies to
> all
> > package managers (notably dnf, packagekit, gnome-software, discove
I believe the purpose of the test case is to have a very generic test case
that works in all environments (not just graphical ones) and applies to all
package managers (notably dnf, packagekit, gnome-software, discover,
dnfdragora, etc -- but not rpm, that is one level below them). It relies on
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:38 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
>
> I have completed a first draft of my proposed revision to the
> "QA:Testcase package install remove" Base test case. I got some input
> based on my initial e'mail on this. I believe I have addressed those
> items.
>
> I believe it i
10 matches
Mail list logo
