On 04/09/14 15:47, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Has a name been chosen Fedora 21 yet?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2013-October/012209.html
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
A new openssh showed up on yum update this evening,
along with a new Heisenbug kernel and other stuff.
My server now passes the heartbleed test.
Has a name been chosen Fedora 21 yet?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded App
On 04/09/14 14:55, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
Of
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>> > According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
>> > Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:48:16 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:48:16 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > > restart your services after in
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 12:00 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > restart your services after installing it.
>
> So, I tried to update openssl as the announcement sugge
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
> > Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
>
> RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:44 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 06:36 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > yum -y install koji
> > > koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1
> > > yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1.x86_64.rpm
> According to the announcement, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > restart your services after installing it.
>
> So, I
On Ter, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
> > result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
>
> http://fedoramagazine.org/statu
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> restart your services after installing it.
So, I tried to update openssl as the announcement suggested. I couldn't
do it via dnf:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/92
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
> Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is carrying a
ton of patches.
I expect this is going to cause a lot of
On 04/08/2014 06:36 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
yum -y install koji
> koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1
> yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1.x86_64.rpm
According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
--
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:20 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> No sign of an update in yum yet - just checked.
Please grab the package directly from koji if it's urgent. It's
mentioned in the announcement Robyn made:
> For Fedora 19 x86_64:
> yum -y install koji
> koji download-build --arc
On 04/08/2014 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
http://fedoramagazine.org/status-on-cve-2014-0160-aka
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
> result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
http://fedoramagazine.org/status-on-cve-2014-0160-aka-heartbleed/
The update has been available sin
18 matches
Mail list logo
