Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > The 'new style' tracker bug aliases are as follows: > > AlphaBlocker > AlphaFreezeException > BetaBlocker > BetaFreezeException > FinalBlocker > FinalFreezeException > Versioned aliases will still be applied to all the tracker bugs, so

Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-01-23 Thread Kamil Paral
> There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the > final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the > first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the > list archives). So I decided to go ahead and Just Do It, putting the > proposal into

Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-01-22 Thread Lili Nie
Thanks and support+1:). - Original Message - From: "Adam Williamson" To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:30:25 PM Subject: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exc

Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-01-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 19:30:25 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the list archives). So I dec

Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-01-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I can think of a couple of potential issues with the 'dynamic' tracker > names (I'm not sure whether nominations will 'transfer' from one release > to the next when we change where the alias points, and if so, whether we > want that, espe

Re: Nice-to-have

2012-05-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 21:58 -0700, Rob Healey wrote: > Hello... > > This is a bug that has been around since the very biginning of F17, > and it is still here... > > It is NOT life-threathening or a crasher of any sort, but it is > irritating nevertheless... One of the key definitions of an NTH

Re: Nice-to-have bug trackers

2010-09-19 Thread Christopher Beland
Seems like a fine idea if the release engineering people actually use it and the overhead to maintain it isn't excessive. It would be nice to eliminate the "nice to have" in a different sense bug trackers - like F15Target (which isn't currently blocking anything) to prevent confusion and wasted ef

Re: Nice-to-have bug trackers

2010-09-18 Thread Steven Haigh
On 09/18/2010 08:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 18:45 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: >> I'd like to see these as nice-to-be-fixed bugs before F14 - otherwise >> F13 will be a more polished release than F14 imho... >> >> Bluetooth always disabled on startup >> https://bugzilla.red

Re: Nice-to-have bug trackers

2010-09-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 18:45 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: > I'd like to see these as nice-to-be-fixed bugs before F14 - otherwise > F13 will be a more polished release than F14 imho... > > Bluetooth always disabled on startup > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634205 That's on the list a

Re: Nice-to-have bug trackers

2010-09-18 Thread Steven Haigh
I'd like to see these as nice-to-be-fixed bugs before F14 - otherwise F13 will be a more polished release than F14 imho... Bluetooth always disabled on startup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634205 ghostscript error printing PDF with image. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i