Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-08 Thread Kamil Paral
> > > I'm not sure that there is a whole lot of value in keeping alpha > > > around > > > at this point, though. > > > > That's what I was going to say. Future milestones can be useful, > > past > > are not, for the purpose of this page. (It's _sometimes_ useful to > > look > > at the history of b

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-08 Thread Kamil Paral
> > I'm not sure that there is a whole lot of value in keeping alpha > > around > > at this point, though. > > That's what I was going to say. Future milestones can be useful, past > are not, for the purpose of this page. (It's _sometimes_ useful to > look > at the history of blockers for a previo

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 11:19 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:07:44 + > I disagree - while beta is the current milestone, I think that there is > value in being able to see what bugs are currently proposed/accepted as > blocker/nth for final even though that's pretty far in the

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Tim Flink
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:15:01 + (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > Can there be explicit links to the blocker and NTH tracker bugs (for > example, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752660 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752664 for F18 Beta)? I > know one can click through

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Tim Flink
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:07:26 +0200 drago01 wrote: > There is a useless horizontal scrollbar (1680x1050 res). Huh, I never really noticed that but it's definitely there. I imagine it's due to the layout framework I'm using and will see if I can get rid of it. Thanks, Tim signature.asc Descr

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Tim Flink
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:07:44 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/05/2012 01:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > Thanks in advance for the feedback, > > Looks better the previous instances. > > Should not the default homepage always be the relevant milestone > being used? Perhaps, but there is

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Can there be explicit links to the blocker and NTH tracker bugs (for example, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752660 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752664 for F18 Beta)? I know one can click through one of the listed bugs if there is one, but there's no guarantee of tha

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread drago01
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > I'm getting close to being ready to deploy a new version of the blocker > tracking app to production but I'd like to see a bit more testing > before I do so. > > http://supermegawaffle.com/blockerbugs-devel/ > > I've added the tracking of blocker-

Re: New Blocker Tracking App Version - Request for Testing

2012-10-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/05/2012 01:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote: Thanks in advance for the feedback, Looks better the previous instances. Should not the default homepage always be the relevant milestone being used? As in ( for BETA ) HOME FEDORA 18 Alpha,Fedora 18 Beta,Fedora 18 Final buttons be removed and instead