On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:44:59AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> poma wrote:
> > xulrunner i686 29.0-1.fc21rawhide
> > 25 M
>
> Protip: You can remove xulrunner from your system now. Firefox no
> longer requires the standalone package.
Unless some o
poma wrote:
xulrunner i686 29.0-1.fc21rawhide 25 M
Protip: You can remove xulrunner from your system now. Firefox no longer
requires the standalone package.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 5/2/2014 6:32 AM, poma wrote:
> On 02.05.2014 11:50, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 May 2014 23:23:16 +0200, poma wrote:
>>
>>> # yum update --skip-broken
>>
>>> ---> Package mozldap.i686 0:6.0.5-11.fc20 will be installed
>>> --> Processing Dependency: svrcore >= 4.0.3 for package:
>>> m
On 02.05.2014 11:50, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 01 May 2014 23:23:16 +0200, poma wrote:
>
>> # yum update --skip-broken
>
>> ---> Package mozldap.i686 0:6.0.5-11.fc20 will be installed
>> --> Processing Dependency: svrcore >= 4.0.3 for package:
>> mozldap-6.0.5-11.fc20.i686
>
> ---> Pack
On 01.05.2014 23:36, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:23 PM, poma wrote:
>
>> Transaction check error:
>> file /usr/bin/mutter-launch from install of mutter-3.13.1-1.fc21.i686
>> conflicts with file from package mutter-wayland-3.12.1-1.fc21.i686
>>
>
> mutter-wayland and mutter got
On Thu, 01 May 2014 23:23:16 +0200, poma wrote:
> # yum update --skip-broken
> ---> Package mozldap.i686 0:6.0.5-11.fc20 will be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: svrcore >= 4.0.3 for package:
> mozldap-6.0.5-11.fc20.i686
---> Package svrcore.i686 0:4.0.4-10.fc20 will be installed
> Packa
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:23 PM, poma wrote:
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/bin/mutter-launch from install of mutter-3.13.1-1.fc21.i686
> conflicts with file from package mutter-wayland-3.12.1-1.fc21.i686
>
mutter-wayland and mutter got merged into one.
mutter-3.13.1-2 should fix thi
On 01.05.2014 09:09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> It's likely related to what Yum does to "find the culprit that breaks
> dependencies". The --skip-broken option implies that the depsolver must
> exclude some package from the transaction set and restart the depsolving
> in another attempt at findi
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:02:18 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 06:56 +0200, poma wrote:
> > On 01.05.2014 06:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 05:15 +0200, poma wrote:
> > >
> > >> Cases [1] and [2] are quite bizarre and unique, related to the Firefox
> >
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 06:56 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 01.05.2014 06:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 05:15 +0200, poma wrote:
> >
> >> Cases [1] and [2] are quite bizarre and unique, related to the Firefox
> >> installation.
> >
> > AFAICS it's all basically the same bug you al
On 01.05.2014 06:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 05:15 +0200, poma wrote:
>
>> Cases [1] and [2] are quite bizarre and unique, related to the Firefox
>> installation.
>
> AFAICS it's all basically the same bug you already linked to, an issue
> with the rpm dependency generator
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 05:15 +0200, poma wrote:
> Cases [1] and [2] are quite bizarre and unique, related to the Firefox
> installation.
AFAICS it's all basically the same bug you already linked to, an issue
with the rpm dependency generators.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: a
12 matches
Mail list logo