On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:05 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Anyone else, thoughts on listing Flatpak explicitly in [0]?
My interpretation is that Flatpak is already covered implicitly, in
the same way that RPMs are. The careful reader will notice that "rpm"
doesn't appear there except in "rpm-ostree",
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:57 PM Brandon Nielsen via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Based on some discussion at today's blocker review meeting, I thought I
> would take the temperature of the room for making Flatpak support
> explicit in at least some of the criteria?
>
> The biggest
