Re: Graphics adapter bugs blocker status rationale

2012-10-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 17:25 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 21:24 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Adam Williamson > >> wrote: > >> > Hey folks. So this morning I remembered that > >> > https://fe

Re: Graphics adapter bugs blocker status rationale

2012-10-06 Thread drago01
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 21:24 +0200, drago01 wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > Hey folks. So this morning I remembered that >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ exists - it's a rather >> > u

Re: Graphics adapter bugs blocker status rationale

2012-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 21:24 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks. So this morning I remembered that > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ exists - it's a rather > > useful page for explaining bits of the blocker process that we s

Re: Graphics adapter bugs blocker status rationale

2012-10-05 Thread drago01
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks. So this morning I remembered that > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ exists - it's a rather > useful page for explaining bits of the blocker process that we should > probably refer to more often. Given that the quest