Re: Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-09 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, mwes...@verizon.net wrote: > > This hardware appears to be a write-off for Gnome3 now (see the > comment by Owen Taylor at the BZ below), but I'll still point out > something interesting I saw on my other ATI. > > I happen to have an RV200, which I tried with F15BetaRC1, and wh

Re: Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-09 Thread mwesten
Apr 8, 2011 12:03:05 PM, test@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: >The reason this is a fallacy is that you haven't established that the >level of OpenGL support is the *only* difference between the >configurations in question, and it certainly isn't. There are all sorts >of others. As Ajax says, it's

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:20 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 17:58:43 +0200, > Christoph Frieben wrote: > > 2011/4/7 Adam Pribyl: > > >> OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 7.10.1 > > > > > > And this is something that is not going to change any time... right? > > > > Yo

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Massimo Gengarelli
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:55 +0200, drago01 wrote: > pot_textures aren't are hard requirement so yes you are wrong. Nice to know, but that doesn't change the fact that two new-generation window managers (Mutter and Compiz with Unity plugin) that are both lying on OpenGL are showing the same identic

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:55 +0200, drago01 wrote: > pot_textures aren't are hard requirement so yes you are wrong. well, he may not be - it may be that not having them causes it to hit a fallback path which we haven't tested well and which is buggy. in any case, the sensible path here would seem

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 17:58:43 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote: > 2011/4/7 Adam Pribyl: > >>      OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 7.10.1 > > > > And this is something that is not going to change any time... right? > > You are mistaken. Current F15 including updates-testing (enabled by > defaul

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread drago01
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Massimo Gengarelli wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> The reason this is a fallacy is that you haven't established that the >> level of OpenGL support is the *only* difference between the >> configurations in question, and it certa

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Massimo Gengarelli
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The reason this is a fallacy is that you haven't established that the > level of OpenGL support is the *only* difference between the > configurations in question, and it certainly isn't. There are all sorts > of others. As Ajax says, it's

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Massimo Gengarelli wrote: > I'm almost sure it's not a Fedora's bug because I'm running Gnome Shell > successfully on my Asus EeePC 1000H (which has a i915 Intel video card, > capable of running OpenGL 1.4+). The logic here is: * Card A / Driver B is capable of

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Kevin DeKorte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2011 09:58 AM, Christoph Frieben wrote: > 2011/4/7 Adam Pribyl: >>> OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 7.10.1 >> >> And this is something that is not going to change any time... right? > > You are mistaken. Current F15 including updates-tes

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/4/7 Adam Pribyl: >>      OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 7.10.1 > > And this is something that is not going to change any time... right? You are mistaken. Current F15 including updates-testing (enabled by default) features mesa-libGL-7.11-0.5.20110401.0.fc15: $ glxinfo | grep -i opengl OpenG

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Massimo Gengarelli
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:57 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > I respect your opinion and all, but I'm pretty sure that's just a bug > not a missing feature. To which GL 1.4 feature do you refer? > > - ajax Could be something related to GLX_textures_non_power_of_two; the screenshot posted by Adam is

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-08 Thread Adam Jackson
On 4/7/11 3:54 AM, Massimo Gengarelli wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue here, using radeon's drivers on an ATI > Radeon 9200 Pro. > > In my opinion it's related to the OpenGL version we're running; probably > the Gnome Shell (specifically Mutter) requires some OpenGL extension > that were i

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-07 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Massimo Gengarelli wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue here, using radeon's drivers on an ATI > Radeon 9200 Pro. > > In my opinion it's related to the OpenGL version we're running; probably > the Gnome Shell (specifically Mutter) requires some OpenGL extension > that were i

Re: Gnome shell corruption

2011-04-07 Thread Massimo Gengarelli
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 17:00 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote: > Does anybody know about any setup option (gnome/gtk/radeon driver) that > may cause corruptions as shown in this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679579 > > PNG: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480275 > >