Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:25:09PM -0300, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: > >Hi, i upgrade to fedora 17 from fedora 16 with no issues. I try to > login > >to Gnome Shell but the warning that say Oh no! and ask to logout show >

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Hi, On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:25:09PM -0300, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi, i upgrade to fedora 17 from fedora 16 with no issues. I try to login >to Gnome Shell but the warning that say Oh no! and ask to logout show up. I had the same problem and there were some javascript errors from

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Yes, it's definitely possibly your hardware breaks with the new kernel. I'm using virtualbox so life is easier for me. I would suggest running a yum update or compiling kernel 3.3rc6 next from source and see if that helps. kernel 3.3rc6 should be in the updates-testing repo soon either way. Dan

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > Ruy, > > I was able to upgrade using the DVD from f16 i386 -> f17 i386. I am able > to login to both Gnome, KDE and XFCE. > > Can you give us some more details on the errors you are getting? > > Dan > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, pringle..

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Ruy, I was able to upgrade using the DVD from f16 i386 -> f17 i386. I am able to login to both Gnome, KDE and XFCE. Can you give us some more details on the errors you are getting? Dan On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Adam Willia

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 15:20 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > > Ruy, > > > > Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD? > > > > I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic. > > preupgrade is highly likely to be completely borked at present, to my >

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 15:20 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > Ruy, > > Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD? > > I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic. preupgrade is highly likely to be completely borked at present, to my knowledge no attempt has been made to set up preupgrade to work for f17

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Ruy, Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD? I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic. Dan On Mar 5, 2012 1:31 PM, "Dan Mashal" wrote: > Ruy, > > I will be testing that right now and will get back to you shortly. > > Thanks, > Dan > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Ruy, I will be testing that right now and will get back to you shortly. Thanks, Dan On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> Hi Ruy, >> >> Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17? >> >> How did you upgrade?

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > Hi Ruy, > > Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17? > > How did you upgrade? Please provide us with the steps to reproduce the > problem. > > I am about to do an upgrade on a Fedora 16 i386 host right now for testing > purposes and woul

Re: gnome 3 problem in f17

Hi Ruy, Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17? How did you upgrade? Please provide us with the steps to reproduce the problem. I am about to do an upgrade on a Fedora 16 i386 host right now for testing purposes and would appreciate this information. Thanks, Dan On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at

Re: Gnome 3

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/01/2011 01:51 AM, Pasha R wrote: > >> Thanks. >> I didn't realize it is still present in fedora. I always liked >> xscreensaver responsiveness. With gnome-screensaver, it sometimes >> takes few seconds until it swaps in its login dialo

Re: Gnome 3

On 06/01/2011 01:51 AM, Pasha R wrote: > Thanks. > I didn't realize it is still present in fedora. I always liked > xscreensaver responsiveness. With gnome-screensaver, it sometimes > takes few seconds until it swaps in its login dialog, even on quite > modern machine, while xscreensaver always pr

Re: Gnome 3

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Scott Doty wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:18 PM, Pasha R wrote: >> >> So, lets  tackle the screensaver issue again. As I understand from >> your answer there are currently no plans to return screensavers other >> than blank screen - it is not a temporary matter of lack o

Re: Gnome 3

On 05/31/2011 12:18 PM, Pasha R wrote: > > So, lets tackle the screensaver issue again. As I understand from > your answer there are currently no plans to return screensavers other > than blank screen - it is not a temporary matter of lack of resources. > I would like to see this decision reversed

Re: Gnome 3

On 06/01/2011 07:49 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > A happy KDE 4.6.X, Gnome 3/Gnome 2.32.X/XFCE/LXDE user:) > All/Most of the desktops have an equal opportunity to be in my machines and I > am happy to have them too! +1 FWIW, the network management GUIs of both GNOME and KDE have deficiencies.

Re: Gnome 3

Lawrence, > -- > All things are workable but not all things work. > Prov. 3:5&6 > > -- The quote \begin{quote} All things are workable but not all things work. Prov. 3:5&6 \end{quote} applies or not? Anyhow, For the users that don't like Gnome 3 I like the Dennis Green Quote :) Q: Who

Re: Gnome 3

On 05/31/2011 12:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > What do you mean? I quoted the hyperbole. I just received Pasha's initial e-mail, which you quoted. My mistake. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome 3

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 14:18, Pasha R wrote: > So, lets  tackle the screensaver issue again. As I understand from > your answer there are currently no plans to return screensavers other > than blank screen - it is not a temporary matter of lack of resources. > I would like to see this decision re

Re: Gnome 3

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:46, Pasha R wrote: >>  it looks like >> this car has gas and brake pedals swapped and steering wheel is >> nowhere to be found.. > > How can you expect anyone to have a productive discussion with you > when the

Re: Gnome 3

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:07, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: >> How can you expect anyone to have a productive discussion with you >> when the starting point is absurd hyperbole? .. > you are > replying to the wrong thread. What do you mean? I quoted

Re: Gnome 3

On 05/31/2011 12:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > How can you expect anyone to have a productive discussion with you > when the starting point is absurd hyperbole? Jason, it seems the discussion is becoming so heated that you are replying to the wrong thread. It might be good for everyone to tak

Re: Gnome 3

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:46, Pasha R wrote: > it looks like > this car has gas and brake pedals swapped and steering wheel is > nowhere to be found.. How can you expect anyone to have a productive discussion with you when the starting point is absurd hyperbole? -- test mailing list test@lists

Re: Gnome 3

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > I have read all of the opinions about Gnome 3 and was reluctant to > participate in the discussion but something would not let me leave it > alone. > Many of you have purchased new cars and I am quite sure there were some > things on the

Re: Gnome 3 Color profiling failure

On 9 May 2011 23:50, ergodic wrote: > The gnome-control-center crashes every time the Spyder-3 color calibrator is > connected to the usb port in Fedora 15_x86_64.  Is this a bug or an > incompatibility of the Spyder-3 Elite with Gnome-3?  The Spyder-3 and > Gnome-2 have work perfectly with Fedora

Re: GNOME 3 Failed to Load

On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:31 +0200, A.J. Werkman wrote: > On the first login after installation of F15 TC1 a screen comes up > telling me, that "GNOME 3 Failed to Load". > > During the installation I that the step "Detecting hardware" takes a > very long time and is done twice. Could this be rela

Re: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)

On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 18:32 +0100, mike cloaked wrote: > If some users switch to KDE again they might then be disinclined to > return to Gnome3 for some time? > > It will certainly be interesting to see the chatter here in the weeks > following GA! Maybe. Would that be terrible? No. I think it w

Re: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > That's not really true, but often what's said is misrepresented as this. > GNOME 3 has a powerful extensions mechanism, and major future plans for > development. A lot of things 'missing' in GNOME 3 compared to GNOME 2 > aren't going to be

Re: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)

On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:09 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > By comparison, if one believes the statements that have been made by > GNOME developers in various blogs, mailing lists, etc., most of the > features that people miss from GNOME 2.x are never coming back. This is > very different. That's no

Re: Gnome 3 Activities button missing.

On 26/04/11 10:55, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 26.4.2011 10:31, Erik P. Olsen napsal(a): >> I have installed F15 beta with all available updates and there is no >> Activities >> button. It hasn't been there from the very beginning. How can I get it? > > Do you have true gnome-shell, or are you limited

Re: Gnome 3 Activities button missing.

Dne 26.4.2011 10:31, Erik P. Olsen napsal(a): > I have installed F15 beta with all available updates and there is no > Activities > button. It hasn't been there from the very beginning. How can I get it? Do you have true gnome-shell, or are you limited by your graphics card (or rather by our mis

Re: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)

On 04/24/2011 09:52 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > some folks wanted kde 3.5.X back, and Fedora would not go back and put in Kde > 3.5.x ---> i don't see Fedora putting Gnome 2.3X back just because people > want it or miss some features You make a good point that from Fedora's point of view, the

Re: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)

--- On Sun, 4/24/11, Ian Pilcher wrote: > From: Ian Pilcher > Subject: GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...) > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 2:09 PM > On 04/24/2011 02:11 PM, Antonio > Olivares wrote: > > This is deja vu all over again with

Re: GNOME 3 Test Day coming

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:43 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > >> Is Gnome 3 targeted to be useful on small display netbooks? If so, it >> might be good to have some QA test case that targets >> usability/functionality on them. > I think upstr

Re: GNOME 3 Test Day coming

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:43 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > Is Gnome 3 targeted to be useful on small display netbooks? If so, it > might be good to have some QA test case that targets > usability/functionality on them. > > I have noticed with mine that many dialog boxes are forced to have a > mi

Re: GNOME 3 Test Day coming

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote: > Hey guys, > > Final of the three Fedora GNOME 3 test days is to be held this Thursday. We > think that the current set of test cases covers most of the important > functionality. However, should any of you guys think that something might

Re: Gnome 3 not showing anything :(

> From: Jason D. Clinton > Subject: Re: Gnome 3 not showing anything :( > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > Cc: "Antonio Olivares" > Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 12:30 PM > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 14:06, Antonio O

Re: Gnome 3 not showing anything :(

--- On Wed, 4/13/11, Jason D. Clinton wrote: From: Jason D. Clinton Subject: Re: Gnome 3 not showing anything :( To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" Cc: "Antonio Olivares" Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 12:30 PM On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 14:

Re: Gnome 3 not showing anything :(

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 14:06, Antonio Olivares wrote: > I have happily run Gnome 3 on several machines three x86_64 ones, and on > one 64 bit machine I installed i686 version and it was running great till > today. Only gkrellm shows up when starting. How can I get it back? > You haven't provid

Re: Gnome 3 Calendar

Dne 13.4.2011 15:28, Steven Stern napsal(a): > The Gnome3 Calendar seems to require Evolution. Is there a way to use > some other calendar program (e.g., Thunderbird with Lightning) or to > link it directly to a Google calendar? For Thunderbird I use with a great profit https://addons.mozilla.org

Re: Gnome 3 Calendar

Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > > The Gnome3 Calendar seems to require Evolution. Is there a way to use > > some other calendar program (e.g., Thunderbird with Lightning) or to > > link it directly to a Google calendar? > > The old panel based clock applet used evolution as well. No

Re: Gnome 3 Calendar

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > The Gnome3 Calendar seems to require Evolution. Is there a way to use > some other calendar program (e.g., Thunderbird with Lightning) or to > link it directly to a Google calendar? The old panel based clock applet used evolution as well. Not

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

Followups to the list, please. On 4/4/11 1:07 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > On 04/04/2011 06:46 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> On 4/3/11 8:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? >> >> Why do you think VNC needs to "do 3D"

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

> How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? > I think you can log in into Gnome Shell, start VNC, and connect from another machine to view/control the desktop. But you can't start the session over VNC on a client without 3D hardware support, that will fall back to Gnome 2. -

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

On 4/3/11 8:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? Why do you think VNC needs to "do 3D" to work? - ajax -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 3.4.2011 14:06, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R napsal(a): >> How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? > > It doesn't and it falls back to the fallback mode (the same goes for > most virtual machines). VNC isn't a VM though

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

Dne 3.4.2011 14:06, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R napsal(a): > How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? It doesn't and it falls back to the fallback mode (the same goes for most virtual machines). Matěj -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http

Re: Gnome 3 and VNC

On 04/03/2011 12:06 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > How is Gnome 3 going to work with VNC, which does not do 3D? You might want to ask that question on the desktop list where all the Gnome developers reside JBG -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https:/

Re: gnome 3 delayed

Dne 1.4.2011 12:06, Fabian A. Scherschel napsal(a): > Check debian.org ;) And shame on us, that we haven't joint “the project” as well! Matěj -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: gnome 3 delayed

--- On Fri, 4/1/11, mike cloaked wrote: > From: mike cloaked > Subject: Re: gnome 3 delayed > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > Date: Friday, April 1, 2011, 4:15 AM > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:32 AM, > Andre Robatino > &g

Re: gnome 3 delayed

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > mike cloaked gmail.com> writes: > >> Great one!  Yes April 1st is a day to be careful taking in news >> stories!  Any other nice pranks been discovered yet? > > http://skynet.kernel.org and possibly http://mail.google.com/mail/help/motion.

Re: gnome 3 delayed

On 04/01/2011 12:37 PM, bsfmig wrote: > Distribution Release: Slackware Linux 1.0 > ！ > *via distrowatch http://www.geforce.com/#/News/articles/voodoo-revived Yeah! Voodoo revived! Jan -- Jan H Wildeboer| EMEA Open Source Affairs

Re: gnome 3 delayed

Distribution Release: Slackware Linux 1.0 ！ *via distrowatch * On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 18:32, Andre Robatino wrote: > mike cloaked gmail.com> writes: > > > Great one! Yes April 1st is a day to be careful taking in news > > stories! Any other nice pranks b

Re: gnome 3 delayed

On 04/01/2011 12:07 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2011/4/1 mike cloaked: >> 2011/4/1 Michał Piotrowski: >> > Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 > (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) The fact that thois delay was anno

Re: gnome 3 delayed

2011/4/1 mike cloaked : > 2011/4/1 Michał Piotrowski : > Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) >>> >>> The fact that thois delay was announced on April 1st didn't make you >>> think? ;-) >> >>

Re: gnome 3 delayed

Check debian.org ;) Fab On Apr 1, 2011 12:02 PM, "mike cloaked" wrote: > 2011/4/1 Michał Piotrowski : > Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html ) >>> >>> The fact that thois delay was announced

Re: gnome 3 delayed

2011/4/1 Michał Piotrowski : >>> Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 >>> (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) >> >> The fact that thois delay was announced on April 1st didn't make you >> think? ;-) > > Some users believes that releasin

Re: gnome 3 delayed

2011/4/1 Jan Wildeboer : > On 04/01/2011 11:53 AM, fsos...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi guys >> >> Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 >> (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) > > The fact that thois delay was announced on April 1st didn't make

Re: gnome 3 delayed

maybe a joke... maybe you're right :) On 1 April 2011 11:54, Jan Wildeboer wrote: > On 04/01/2011 11:53 AM, fsos...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi guys >> >> Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 >> (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) > > The f

Re: gnome 3 delayed

- Original Message - > Hi guys > > Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 > (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) > > What about in f 15 ? I suspect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day -- test mailing list test@lists.fe

Re: gnome 3 delayed

On 04/01/2011 11:53 AM, fsos...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi guys > > Gnome release team has rescheduled gnome 3 for September 2011 > (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html) The fact that thois delay was announced on April 1st didn't make you think? ;-) Jan -- Jan H W

Re: Gnome 3 and Nvidia

On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:20 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Gnom3 3 fails to load on an Intel system and GT-460-SE card > using either default or basic video driver. The Nvidia > driver doesn't compile. > > This makes it difficult to test Gnome 3. You have to use the beta (x86_64) f