On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 08:46 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
>
> I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
> upstream choices as much as possible.
Either way, such
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
upstream choices as much as possible.
If alternative choices are useful for a significant population of Fedora
users, these s
On 08/08/2011 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> What prompted me to suggest this was the comment
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457#c74 referring to
> http://www.golem.de/1108/85539.html (German article). Google's German
> translation isn't very readable but AFAICT it seemed to con
On 08/08/2011 02:16 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
>
On 08/08/2011 08:46 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
>
On 08/08/2011 05:19 PM, Alexjan Carraturo wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
>> I'm considering filing a bug for
>> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
>> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
>> including
>> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..
2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
> the
> Alt key), and
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 11:35 PM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
> >
> >
> > Also, since the last update, the drive-menu icon is being shown
> > perennially even without any external drives being mounted. When i
> > click on it, its showing the hard drive pa
On 05/31/2011 11:35 PM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
>
>
> Also, since the last update, the drive-menu icon is being shown
> perennially even without any external drives being mounted. When i
> click on it, its showing the hard drive partitions which i have
> mounted from /etc/fstab .. This wasnt the beha
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > Works just fine here. What version of GNOME Shell and this extension
> > are you using?
> >
> > $ rpm -q gnome-shell gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu
> >
> > gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.fc15.x
On 05/31/2011 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension :
>> gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description :
>>
>> " Adds a menu in the system status area that
On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension :
> gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description :
>
> " Adds a menu in the system status area that tracks removable disk
> devices attached and offers to
On 04/12/2011 09:49 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hope that helps. One thing that'd be nice if experimental extensions
> could be disabled by default and would only be enabled if added to a
> hypothetical org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions key.
Every single extension is a sub package that you have
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 03:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 08:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Nice job. They are very useful. My personal preference is not to have
> > the dock extension however. I find it distracting in its current
> > incarnation.
>
> I think it sorts of serv
On 04/11/2011 08:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Nice job. They are very useful. My personal preference is not to have
> the dock extension however. I find it distracting in its current
> incarnation.
I think it sorts of serves a temporary clutch till you get used to the
new workflow in GNOME
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:29:47 -0400, Clyde wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 10:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> > break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-e
On 04/10/2011 10:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extensions-3.0.0-4.6d56cfgit.fc15
>
> Rahul
>
Nice job. They ar
On 04/11/2011 07:35 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
> So, currently I see no way of configuring, say, the new doc (position,
> etc) other than install or remove the packages?
No such options at this time.
> gnome-tweek-tool does not give me anything new.
Other than the user theme extension, no other e
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:28 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extensions-3.0.0-4.6d56cfgit.fc15
>
> Rahul
>
So,
19 matches
Mail list logo
