On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:37 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 07:05 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > My personal opinion is that Core and up are pretty tolerable and anything
> > less kind of isn't but also already kind of wasn't. But I no longer really
> > have any idea whether my threshold
On 05/03/2012 07:05 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> My personal opinion is that Core and up are pretty tolerable and anything
> less kind of isn't but also already kind of wasn't. But I no longer really
> have any idea whether my threshold for acceptable interactivity matches that
> of anyone else.
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 20:27 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> :D
> anyway, i'd say that indeed, starting with a default (sftware
> rendering) and offering the user the chance to choose (a la fallback
> graphics) could be a win-win situation. everyone can select for its
> own config, whatever fits bes
May 4, 2012 11:27:54 AM
Subject: Re: GMA500 vs. G3 software render
2012/5/4 Al Dunsmuir < al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca >
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 4:01:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM,
2012/5/4 Al Dunsmuir
> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 4:01:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> >> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> >> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wro
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 4:01:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
>> > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> >> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> The world is full of A
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The world is full of Adams, it appears!
If certain religions are to be believed, at one p
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The world is full of Adams, it appears!
>>> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote:
While I consider the latest development on gma500,
On Thu, 3 May 2012, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
Just thought I would weigh in on this issue ...
I use the gma500 and, yes g3 is a bit slow, but performance has been improving.
I follow your blog closely, I have 1.33GHz Atom and compared to fallback
it is a big difference. With fallback it flies.
On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote:
While I consider the latest development on gma500, present in many Atom
base netbooks, a great success and would like to say thank you to
developer(s),
When
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 12:52:13 PM, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> So if we want to blacklist low performers, okay, that's a thing we can
>> do I suppose. Where do we draw the line?
> 'anything Atom is slow as hell' would be an obvious win, I suspect. I
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> So if we want to blacklist low performers, okay, that's a thing we can
> do I suppose. Where do we draw the line?
'anything Atom is slow as hell' would be an obvious win, I suspect. If
your baseline of acceptable performance is 'Core and
Just thought I would weigh in on this issue ...
I use the gma500 and, yes g3 is a bit slow, but performance has been improving.
It is on my to do list to take one of the F17 daily spins for a test drive.
If you find g3 slow, use another window manager, but I sort of like G3 on my
netbook ;)
In
On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote:
While I consider the latest development on gma500, present in many Atom
base netbooks, a great success and would like to say thank you to
developer(s),
When you say "latest development", what exactl
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> While I consider the latest development on gma500, present in many Atom
> base netbooks, a great success and would like to say thank you to
> developer(s), G3 software render negates all this for gnome shell as this
> is extremely slow on A
15 matches
Mail list logo
