On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 09:41 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> What I don't like, however, is that I'd like to avoid displaying names
> for TC results (because we will be aggregating many results and it
> would be too space consuming), but display them for RC results
> (because we won't be aggregating res
> > It isn't at all, but it has the rather large problem that it breaks the
> > API :) All existing {{result}} entries in all pages will be invalid.
> > That seems like a deal-breaker. We're kind of locked forever into the
> > first five fields being 'result', 'username', 'bug#', 'bug#', 'bug#', I
> > {{result|pass|adamwill|TC1}}
> > {{result|fail|adamwill|TC1|123456}}
> > {{result|fail|adamwill|TC1|123456|111222}}
> >
> > I think that's no less readable than the original schema.
>
> It isn't at all, but it has the rather large problem that it breaks the
> API :) All existing {{result}} en
On 07/29/2014 01:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 09:16 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>>> Hah - when i was two paragraphs into your mail, I started thinking 'hmm,
>>> we could amend the Result template' :P - great minds think alike, it
>>> seems...
>>>
>>> In a way it'd be clean
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 09:16 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hah - when i was two paragraphs into your mail, I started thinking 'hmm,
> > we could amend the Result template' :P - great minds think alike, it
> > seems...
> >
> > In a way it'd be cleaner to have the image as part of the template, but
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 07:52 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Hi, folks.
> > >
> > > So, we're scheduled for Alpha TC1 tomorrow. We had a nice happy
> > > co-operative plan where QA and the WGs would collaborate on revising the
> > > release validation test process for Fedora.next...
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 07:52 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hi, folks.
> >
> > So, we're scheduled for Alpha TC1 tomorrow. We had a nice happy
> > co-operative plan where QA and the WGs would collaborate on revising the
> > release validation test process for Fedora.next...
> >
> > ...which, well,
> Hi, folks.
>
> So, we're scheduled for Alpha TC1 tomorrow. We had a nice happy
> co-operative plan where QA and the WGs would collaborate on revising the
> release validation test process for Fedora.next...
>
> ...which, well, didn't really happen. As of this morning we were nowhere
> near havi
