On 27.08.2013 21:59, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> Makes sense... the kernel is "tainted" after an oops. I was distracted
> by thoughts about software with dubious provenance.
>
> The first kernel oops (that taints the kernel) is documented here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Makes sense... the kernel is "tainted" after an oops. I was distracted
by thoughts about software with dubious provenance.
The first kernel oops (that taints the kernel) is documented here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001806
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Aug 27, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>
> What does "Tainted" mean two lines above?
There's been a kernel oops prior these entries, and due to the oops there's
uncertainty about the cause of subsequent problems. So you pretty much ignore
anything after the kernel is tainted and
