Adam Williamson wrote:
> At the user level it's pretty simple: it's a modern replacement for
> BIOS. It's an entirely new system firmware standard for PCs.
>
> The most user-noticeable features of UEFI are probably secure boot
> (which has been discussed ad infinitum: the important thing here is
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 18:09 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Could you try one?
>
> I have to pay when I go over my monthly GB download limit.
>
> > [EFI]'s a system firmware level thing.
>
> That's what I thought, but, having googled it numerous times, it seems to be
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Could you try one?
I have to pay when I go over my monthly GB download limit.
> [EFI]'s a system firmware level thing.
That's what I thought, but, having googled it numerous times, it seems to be
quite mysterious, still, and straight answers are hard to come by.
--
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:31 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Do early 17 DVDs work for you? Have you tried?
>
> This is the first Fedora 17 disk I have tried.
>
> > The 17 Beta TCs should still be available at stage/, and the
> > Alpha is of course available 'officially
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Do early 17 DVDs work for you? Have you tried?
This is the first Fedora 17 disk I have tried.
> The 17 Beta TCs should still be available at stage/, and the
> Alpha is of course available 'officially'.
I didn't bother with any of the alphas. Particularly, because of the
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:32 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Peter Gueckel wrote:
>
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> Did you checksum it?
> >
> > No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
> >
>
> OK. I finally bothered to checksum it and it is OK.
Bit confused then, rea
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Did you checksum it?
>
> No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
>
OK. I finally bothered to checksum it and it is OK.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Did you checksum it?
No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 03/26/2012 03:31 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Then the computer rebooted, read the DVD, said it would boot it in 3 seconds,
then a message appeared in the upper left corner about "trying to allocate 1135
pages... for vmlinuz" (I think it said).
Sounds like a kernel bug so go and file it.
You pr
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 21:31 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> stan wrote:
>
> > Overall assessment - a smooth and positive experience.
>
> I downloaded the Beta Release Candidate 1 and just tried to install it to a
> spare partition.
>
> This is what happened:
>
> The computer booted, read the DVD
stan wrote:
> Overall assessment - a smooth and positive experience.
I downloaded the Beta Release Candidate 1 and just tried to install it to a
spare partition.
This is what happened:
The computer booted, read the DVD, said it would boot it in 3 seconds, then a
message appeared in the upper
11 matches
Mail list logo
