On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 08:03 +0100, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> Hi all guys.
>
> First of all, thank you for the welcome and the kind words.
>
> Let's prepare some work for tomorrow's evening... I'd like to
> perform some tests on my KVM against Beta TC4 Desktop.
>
> I'm just a bit unsure ab
On March 21, 2015 8:00:27 AM PDT, Carlos Morel-Riquelme
wrote:
>:) it's nice learn new things every day /o/
>
>On 21 March 2015 at 11:53, Mukundan Ragavan
>
>wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 03/21/2015 09:52 AM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
>> > Hello Adam,
:) it's nice learn new things every day /o/
On 21 March 2015 at 11:53, Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 03/21/2015 09:52 AM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> > Hello Adam, i install the repo and later follow the step, so i
> > think that the page o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/21/2015 09:52 AM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hello Adam, i install the repo and later follow the step, so i
> think that the page of TC4 y ready
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC4_Install
ation
>
>
>
> :)
Have a nice trip, running it now
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Williamson"
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 8:32:24 AM
Subject: Beta TC4 result pages
Can someone please create the beta tc4 result pages? I'm on a bus without a
laptop :) all you have to
Hello Adam, i install the repo and later follow the step, so i think that
the page of TC4 y ready
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC4_Installation
:)
On 21 March 2015 at 11:32, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Can someone please create the beta tc4 result pages? I'm on a bu
On 10/21/2014 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 11:31 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Well, at least kickstart works. Also live-lxde works.
However, "Generic" ... has the Fedora Project been renamed the "Generic
Project"??? I am having a WTF moment!
Both the kickstart insta
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 11:31 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Well, at least kickstart works. Also live-lxde works.
>
> However, "Generic" ... has the Fedora Project been renamed the "Generic
> Project"??? I am having a WTF moment!
>
> Both the kickstart install (using the workstation netinst
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:31:05AM -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Both the kickstart install (using the workstation netinstall) and
> the liveinst with the live-lxde iso result in /etc/system-release
> being "Generic release 21 (Generic)". Now I realize that we are
> into this producty thingy, bu
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 11:31 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Well, at least kickstart works. Also live-lxde works.
>
> However, "Generic" ... has the Fedora Project been renamed the "Generic
> Project"??? I am having a WTF moment!
> Both the kickstart install (using the workstation netinstall)
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 16:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 4:18 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
> wrote:
> >
> > Found Windows Boot Manager on Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
> > Windows Boot Manager is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig.
> > done
> >
> > Is this supposed to work with
On May 12, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> There's a debug line you can add to the grub.cfg, and possibly you'll get
> more information after the error but before the hang.
Helps to read the whole bug first. I see the debug info. I can't reproduce this
on Apple EFI hardware.
T.C. Hol
On May 12, 2013, at 4:40 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
>
> I already use gummiboot, since GRUB2 can't boot Fedora on my system.
> [1] My main reason for trying this out was to see if GRUB2 could boot
> Windows, as that might be an interesting datapoint to add to that bug.
Not really, it's tot
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's sorta messy to use GRUB2-EFI as a boot manager. Ideally the firmware
> manufacturer would supply a decent GUI boot manager so you can choose the OS,
> rather than rely on GRUB acting as a boot manager.
>
> The better alternative right n
On May 12, 2013, at 4:18 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
wrote:
>
> Found Windows Boot Manager on Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
> Windows Boot Manager is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig.
> done
>
> Is this supposed to work with grub2-mkconfig also, or only from anaconda?
It's sorta messy to use GRU
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If anyone has a UEFI install of Windows and can test installing F19 Beta
> TC4 alongside it, please do - the os-prober update should mean that the
> Windows install will now be present in Fedora's grub menu (before it was
> not).
I haven't
16 matches
Mail list logo
