On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:14 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> BTW, what happened to wobbly windows? Was that someone else?
That's part of compiz.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailin
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 18:22 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> not crashing, but don't mean it's *ready*. Hell, I couldn't find away
> to modify my firewall, change selinux options, or other system type
> config things, without having to use CLI.
Those tools have never been part of GNOME, they're Fed
Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> I appreciate how you clipped out the part where I said it's on the drawing
> board but it didn't make it in time. What do you want us to do? Human
> cloning is, sadly, illegal, and thus we only have the resources that we
> have.
I understand it is on the
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:48, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I think the bit that bugs me the most about gnome-shell is that if
> applications have a long title, you can't tell what the apps is. ie
> LibreOffice... by however many icons. I have to know what the icon
> colour is for what app I want to
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 22:14:08 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 02/27/2011 06:49 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to
>> view?
>> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
>> least on the desktop or something and s
On 02/27/2011 06:49 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
> least on the desktop or something and seen rather easily?
>
Interesting thread. I'm having fun finding way
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:37 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:57 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > I don't care how hard they are working on it. Never said the developers
> > weren't doign a good job. I complimented on it was lot better since F14
> > was being developed.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 20:49, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Grow up and act like adults, please. All of you. On both sides of the
> issue.
>
Condescending, patronizing tone is not welcome.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Holy cow, what incredibly pointless bickering.
Grow up and act like adults, please. All of you. On both sides of the issue.
You're all right.
GNOME 3 is going to be awesome. People are working really hard on it,
and what they're creating is really sweet.
When it ships, it will be missing a lot
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 19:55, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It will be considered "ready" without widgets.
>>
>>
> Without widgets,
>
No, without applets and without a new widget system. System tray icons are
still there: in fallback
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 20:29, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> > Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> > already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting
> GNOME 3
> > ready. Your email isn't particularly helpf
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:57 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> I don't care how hard they are working on it. Never said the developers
> weren't doign a good job. I complimented on it was lot better since F14
> was being developed. But does NOT mean I have to agree bout pushing it
> out the door wit
Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting GNOME 3
> ready. Your email isn't particularly helpful though.
Your email isn't particularly helpful either.
How
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:22 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
> Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting
> GNOME 3 ready. Your email isn't particularly helpful though.
I don't care how hard they ar
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
>
> It will be considered "ready" without widgets.
>
>
Without widgets, firewall control, vino, any method for user groups/control,
selinux menu, ability to reboot, menu system missing "programming", no
desktop. This is just what came to m
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 18:22, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Pretty half baked if ask me. There is no "include it at a later date,
> or next release" option, as that is just trying to get something out the
> door but not include anything else. If applets are going away, no
> problem, then include the
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 18:02 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 17:49, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want
> to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is
> viewable at
>
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 17:49, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
> least on the desktop or something and seen rather easily?
>
As has been discussed to death all ove
18 matches
Mail list logo
