> There's a category for them:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Obsolete_Test_Cases
Thanks, modified.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 05:46 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Btw do we archive ( move ) those wiki pages somewhere under the QA
> > namespace when they are deprecated?
>
> Good question. I don't know. I added a warning box to the page and
> removed it from the test matrix skeleton, that should work.
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 05:05 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
> > > for developers, but no user wil
> Btw do we archive ( move ) those wiki pages somewhere under the QA
> namespace when they are deprecated?
Good question. I don't know. I added a warning box to the page and removed it
from the test matrix skeleton, that should work. It's still reachable through
categories.
--
test mailing list
On 09/20/2012 04:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>Last but not least, we should consider removing
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
>because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
>for developers, but no user will ever use that, they will
> > > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly
> > > useful
> > > for developers, but no user will ever use that, they will use
> > > updates.img
> > I have updated our test case with the new instructions:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> >
> >
> > We have more test cases regarding bug reporting from Anaconda:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 21:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
> > for developers, but no user will
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 13:31 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Today, I have pushed (to master branch) a patch that adds an easy way
> > for testing exception handling (and bug reporting) in Anaconda. It
> > utilizes unix signals and can be fired by sending SIGUSR1 signal to
> > the
> > main anaconda pr
> Today, I have pushed (to master branch) a patch that adds an easy way
> for testing exception handling (and bug reporting) in Anaconda. It
> utilizes unix signals and can be fired by sending SIGUSR1 signal to
> the
> main anaconda process (there are usually two processes, main is the
> one
> with
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 10:47 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:36:21 +0200
> Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>
>
>
> > The underlaying code raises an exception in a separate thread and
> > with a stack containing non-ascii characters (worst case scenario
> > designed from the bugs in ex
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:36:21 +0200
> Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>
>
>
> > The underlaying code raises an exception in a separate thread and
> > with a stack containing non-ascii characters (worst case scenario
> > designed from the bugs in exception handling seen so far). It also
> > produces
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:36:21 +0200
Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> The underlaying code raises an exception in a separate thread and
> with a stack containing non-ascii characters (worst case scenario
> designed from the bugs in exception handling seen so far). It also
> produces a unique stack tra
13 matches
Mail list logo
