Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-22 Thread Bill Nottingham
Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) said: > > In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it > > enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner > > startup/shutdown (moving parts of rc.sysinit, etc. to systemd units.) > > Does that mean, I can commit my rc.sy

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/22 Harald Hoyer : > On 09/15/2010 10:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? >>> >>> No. >> >> In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it >> enables us to actually merge the changes t

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-22 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 09/15/2010 10:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: >>> Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? >> >> No. > > In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it > enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner > startup/

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:38:34PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it > enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner > startup/shutdown (moving parts of rc.sysinit, etc. to systemd units.) I think that if gettin

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread Frank Murphy
On 15/09/10 21:52, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it >> enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner >> startup/shutdown (moving parts of rc.sysinit, etc. to systemd units.) > > Totally utter cool idea :) > > rc.

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: >> > Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? >> >> No. > > In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it > enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/15 Bill Nottingham : > drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: >> > Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? >> >> No. > > In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it > enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner > startup/shutdown (moving par

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread Bill Nottingham
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: > > Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? > > No. In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner startup/shutdown (moving parts of rc.sysinit, etc. to systemd unit

Re: Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? No. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Rawhide: Upstart, systemd reversion

2010-09-15 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too? Sincerely yours, Rob G. Healey -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test