On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I know there's a bit of a backlog of proposed criteria changes I really
> > > should look at, but wanted to write thi
> * A system logging infrastructure must be available and enabled by
> default. It must provide at least basic local file-based logging of
> kernel messages, and allow other components to write log messages. This
> must be done in accordance with relevant standards accepted by the
> Project
+1
On 05/16/2011 10:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> No, I think basic local logging is all we're interested in. Revision:
>
> * A system logging infrastructure must be available and e
Adam Williamson wrote:
> No, I think basic local logging is all we're interested in. Revision:
>
> * A system logging infrastructure must be available and enabled by
> default. It must provide at least basic local file-based logging of
> kernel messages, and allow other components to write log mess
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I know there's a bit of a backlog of proposed criteria changes I really
> > should look at, but wanted to write this one down before it escapes. Per
> > the thread 'Syslog not runni
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I know there's a bit of a backlog of proposed criteria changes I really
> should look at, but wanted to write this one down before it escapes. Per
> the thread 'Syslog not running?', I'd like to propose the following
> Alpha criterion for
