On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:03 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> The existing basic video driver case[1] has covered it.
> I think minimal package install[2] already covers the 'boot to console'
> case. After install, user boots to the system and then identify if it
> passes Alpha or Beta criteria. The 'releas
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 19:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> > go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and addition
> > to the official criteri
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 19:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and addition
> to the official criteria here.
As there was general agreement with both the 'boot to con
I vote yes to both Beta and Alpha proposals.
> Subject: Release criteria proposal: boot to console
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:19:30 -0700
>
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> go/no-go meetin
+1
-AdamM (From Android)
On Aug 12, 2010 1:19 AM, "Kamil Paral" wrote:
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria ...
I definitely support this proposal.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/...
-
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of
> today's
> go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and
> addition
> to the official criteria here.
>
> First off, we are missing criteria for booting to *console* rather
> than
