Hey folks! Just a heads up, I've just requested a new RC compose for
F32 Final. It should show up in 6-8 hours or so. Please help fill out
the validation for it. The changes since RC3 are here:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9403#comment-643176
thanks everyone!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Commu
The process that's running is gnome-software.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 9/19/18 11:59 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/19/18 5:06 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
Back on the evening of 09/17 I downloaded the Workstation Live beta
1.3 ISO, and ran the check sum (ok), and
On 9/19/18 5:06 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
Back on the evening of 09/17 I downloaded the Workstation Live beta 1.3
ISO, and ran the check sum (ok), and burned it to a DVD. I used the DVD
to make a bare metal clean install on my test machine (Lenovo M58P with
E8400 processor) The media che
currently-accepted
blockers (thanks to the dnf team for help there), so an RC4 (aka Beta-
1.4) is currently composing. Compared to RC3 it contains a newer libdnf
with a fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629340 . It
also includes a newer gnome-shell with fixes for FE bug
https
Hi, folks! Just a quick mail to let everyone know where we are with F29
Beta.
We managed to throw together fixes for all the currently-accepted
blockers (thanks to the dnf team for help there), so an RC4 (aka Beta-
1.4) is currently composing. Compared to RC3 it contains a newer libdnf
with a fix
On 04/15/2015 06:48 AM, Justyn Temme wrote:
Running on 2014MBA with braodcom wifi chipset. When trying to build akmods it
freaks
out halfway through. will post a bug report when i have time.
RPMFusion package bugs need to be reported to the RPMFusion package maintainer[1] or
RPMFusion mailing
Running on 2014MBA with braodcom wifi chipset. When trying to build akmods
it freaks out halfway through. will post a bug report when i have time.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 12/03/2014 09:32 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/03/2014 04:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/03/2014 03:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Just installed RC4 and did the power management thing.
Screen is now off on screen off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/03/2014 04:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2014 03:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Just installed RC4 and did the power management thing.
>>
>> Screen is now off on screen off.
>>
>> Int
On 12/03/2014 03:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Just installed RC4 and did the power management thing.
Screen is now off on screen off.
Interesting, when I do a ctl-alt-del to lock the screen, it is not
turning it off.
Just completed an AC screen lock test and the screen turned off.
But
On 12/03/2014 04:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:31 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't know what is happening, but I now see that there is no question
that my Lenovo x120e is running hot during an install.
I have YET to get it to run hot during general usage. Occati
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:31 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I don't know what is happening, but I now see that there is no question
> that my Lenovo x120e is running hot during an install.
>
> I have YET to get it to run hot during general usage. Occationally it
> gets above 70degrees. It is
Just installed RC4 and did the power management thing.
Screen is now off on screen off.
Interesting, when I do a ctl-alt-del to lock the screen, it is not
turning it off.
On 12/03/2014 03:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/02/2014 09:28 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
I don't know what is happening, but I now see that there is no question
that my Lenovo x120e is running hot during an install.
I have YET to get it to run hot during general usage. Occationally it
gets above 70degrees. It is REALLY hot (by feeling fan exhaust) now.
Fan is running full speed
NOTE: Signing of the RC4 tree is not yet complete, there are technical
issues in releng preventing it working. To strictly be sure we're
testing the right bits we should remember to check that the images we
test match the signed checksum files once they're available, and of
cour
: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Verschickt: Fr, 31 Okt 2014 4:03 pm
Betreff: Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
On 30.10.2014 14:44, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> there is a similar problem (of "out of service"
-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 08:27 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> because of changes RC3 -> RC4. Lastly I wrote in a thread that I can
> not install acroreader with Gnome SW tools and not with Yum. What I
> wanted to say is
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 08:27 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> because of changes RC3 -> RC4. Lastly I wrote in a thread that I can
>> not install acroreader with Gnome SW tools and not with Yum. What I
>>
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 08:27 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> because of changes RC3 -> RC4. Lastly I wrote in a thread that I can
> not install acroreader with Gnome SW tools and not with Yum. What I
> wanted to say is not, that I use Acroreader, but that there is a
> chan
Hi,
because of changes RC3 -> RC4. Lastly I wrote in a thread that I can not
install acroreader with Gnome SW tools and not with Yum. What I wanted to say
is not, that I use Acroreader, but that there is a change from RC3 to RC4. Yum
and Gnome SW tools could install in RC3 this ancient prog
On 30.10.2014 14:44, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> there is a similar problem (of "out of service") for the Linux Flash-Plugin,
> nevertheless I don't know a Linux program, which does this feature sufficient
> as the Flash-Plugin does.
> Kind Regards
>
Pipelight
Windows plugins in Linux browsers
ty assurance of Fedora releases
Verschickt: Do, 30 Okt 2014 12:55 pm
Betreff: Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
On 30.10.2014 12:53, poma wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 07:59, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> installation of workstation x86_64
ounce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
On 30.10.2014 07:59, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> installation of workstation x86_64 on an Laptop (liveUSB-Creator - flash
> media
- installation on external disk), Yum update, all ok, works fine.
> But I can not install
ra 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
On 30.10.2014 07:59, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> installation of workstation x86_64 on an Laptop (liveUSB-Creator - flash
> media
- installation on external disk), Yum update, all ok, works fine.
> But I can not install Adobe
true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-acrobat-pdf-reader-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
>> worked, Adobe Reader now operates.
>> In RC3 I could install via
>> ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.5.5/enu/, in RC4 does not
>> work.
>> Kind Regards
>
tos-red-hat-rhel/
> worked, Adobe Reader now operates.
> In RC3 I could install via
> ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.5.5/enu/, in RC4 does not
> work.
> Kind Regards
>
It is not advisable because
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-July/451167.h
tos-red-hat-rhel/
> worked, Adobe Reader now operates.
> In RC3 I could install via
> ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.5.5/enu/, in RC4 does not
> work.
> Kind Regards
>
It is not advisable.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-October/454556.h
://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.5.5/enu/, in RC4 does not work.
Kind Regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Andre Robatino
An: test-announce
Verschickt: Do, 30 Okt 2014 3:17 am
Betreff: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!
NOTE: The
NOTE: The last compose was RC2.
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:19 . Please see the
following pages for download
This is not the official announcement as the compose has not been signed
off by release engineering, but the Beta RC4 lives are now all complete
in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?method=createLiveCD&state=closed&view=tree&order=-id
and I've put the validati
Installed Rawhide rc4 on my office machine today.
I had to use a Heisenbug anaconda as the current anaconda crashes.
As usual I installed the Gnome based creative/workstation with
Mingw, libreoffice, gnuplot, etc. I then installed Xfce and a bunch
of libs and apps I use. for ham radio.
RC4
BTW, the behavior of RC3 and RC4 is not *exactly* the same - for example, in
text install for i386 RC3 vs. RC4, the positions of the root and user spokes
are different - this is an example of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929177 .
--
test mailing list
test
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT identical. The
> > checksums are different, and just looking at the DVD, the options under
> > "In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:07:34 -0800
Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT
> > identical. The checksums are different, and
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT identical. The
> checksums are different, and just looking at the DVD, the options under
> "Installation source" are different (RC3 only had one option, RC
The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT identical. The
checksums are different, and just looking at the DVD, the options under
"Installation source" are different (RC3 only had one option, RC4 has the
regular complement) and the add-ons for "Basic desktop"
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 20:15 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
> targets.
>
> As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 4
> (RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, incl
tree
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC4/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-Beta-AMI
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC4/Images/x86_64/Fedora-Images-x86_64-20-Beta-AMI
when we get to final Beta and the images are uploaded to all regions
they will all be listed an
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:26
netinstall "rescue mode" no go,
not in test matrix netinstall, so added to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908118
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
No extensions available for gnome-tweak-tool. Alpha???:-)
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
64 bit netinst on jump drive still can not configure HD
if booted with UEFI on an Asus p8z77-vle plus and 3770k.
I did not trybooting without UEFI on this machine.
Same jump drive installed nominally on a E6550
on an older mobo plain boot.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC4 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at:
ami-c187cca8 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-5985ce30 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 11:47 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > I don't know offhand what I have set in the BIOS, but I nuked the
> > pre-loaded Ubuntu install and did a fresh F19 install. A BIOS install,
> > because there was some kind of annoying roadblock when I tried to do a
> > UEFI insta
On 07.06.2013 07:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 23:25 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 23:25 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
>
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had
rborn" mailto:denni...@conversis.de>> wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my
new Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the
box this morning I found that it apparently had woken up again
during the night
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had
quot;Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" > <mailto:denni...@conversis.de>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my
> > new Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the
> > box this mor
On 28.05.2013 05:55, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I have this problem, but last time (after update) not affected
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
On May 28, 2013 4:21 AM, "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" mailto:denni...@conversis.de>> wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using th
I have this problem, but last time (after update) not affected
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
On May 28, 2013 4:21 AM, "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
> Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to w
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
> Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
> this morning I found that it apparently had woken up again during
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had woken up again during the
night for no apparent reason.
Does anyone have an idea what could be the
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel
Thanks to Kamil, Adam, Eric, stephen, Dennis and anyone else that thought
on how to help me. Problem solved after I enabled vt-d and UEFI.
My guess is that when not working with UEFI the OS didn't recognize the
possibility of working with virtualization for some reason. I will check
that on my next
On 04/19/2013 09:15 PM, moshe nahmias wrote:
> According to what intel says my processor does support virtualization
> (model Q9400). Wasn't able to update the bios yet, can't make a bootable
> cd with the files needed, and on capabilities from lshw says among other
> things vmx (at least on other
According to what intel says my processor does support virtualization
(model Q9400). Wasn't able to update the bios yet, can't make a bootable cd
with the files needed, and on capabilities from lshw says among other
things vmx (at least on other places on this thread people said that means
virtuali
On 19.04.2013 20:12, moshe nahmias wrote:
I have VT and VT-d on my bios, I enabled VT both and it doesn't help.
When I try to use the command eric gave (thanks for that) I have the
same problems with VT and VT-d enabled or disabled.
When I enabled VT-d I had an error from abrt that said that most
On 19 April 2013 12:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 2 things:
> 1) Does the CPU actually have VT in it. The BIOS can enable disable to its
> hearts content, but if the CPU does not have it, then there isn't much that
> can be done.
> 2) See if you have BIOS updates that you can apply. This has
2 things:
1) Does the CPU actually have VT in it. The BIOS can enable disable to its
hearts content, but if the CPU does not have it, then there isn't much that
can be done.
2) See if you have BIOS updates that you can apply. This has been a bug in
various BIOSes in the past (say you do something
I have VT and VT-d on my bios, I enabled VT both and it doesn't help.
When I try to use the command eric gave (thanks for that) I have the same
problems with VT and VT-d enabled or disabled.
When I enabled VT-d I had an error from abrt that said that most likely my
bios weren't configured right so
On 19/04/13 10:04 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 19 April 2013 03:58, moshe nahmias mailto:mosheg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I checked the sha and it matches the one on the site, so I guess
thats not the problem. thanks for the try.
I just installed libvirt-daemon-kvm and qemu-kvm
On 19 April 2013 03:58, moshe nahmias wrote:
> I checked the sha and it matches the one on the site, so I guess thats not
> the problem. thanks for the try.
>
> I just installed libvirt-daemon-kvm and qemu-kvm and still can't work with
> kvm.
> It says that KVM is not available. What should I ins
On 04/19/2013 03:58 AM, moshe nahmias wrote:
> I checked the sha and it matches the one on the site, so I guess thats not
> the problem. thanks for the try.
>
> I just installed libvirt-daemon-kvm and qemu-kvm and still can't work with
> kvm.
> It says that KVM is not available. What should I inst
> I just installed libvirt-daemon-kvm and qemu-kvm and still can't work with
> kvm.
> It says that KVM is not available. What should I install so I will have it?
You might need to restart libvirtd service or reboot the computer.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
ht
On 04/19/2013 01:12 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or
>> 'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on
>> installed systems.
>
> When you want the mass publ
I checked the sha and it matches the one on the site, so I guess thats not
the problem. thanks for the try.
I just installed libvirt-daemon-kvm and qemu-kvm and still can't work with
kvm.
It says that KVM is not available. What should I install so I will have it?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:01 PM
> When I open the virtual machine and go to view->details on overview details
> are as follows:
> Hhpervisor: qemu
I believe this is the source of the problem. You should use kvm, not qemu. KVM
is the default option.
QEMU is so slow, that it takes 10 minutes on my Core i7 just to begin starting
On 04/18/2013 08:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
No, they've had debug kernels for ages, but debug kernels got quite a
lot slower with the 2.6.40 release (IIRC). Before that the difference
wasn't so great.
Ah, time has flown. It seems just yesterday I read the discussions about
when to enable/s
On 18/04/13 05:12 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Or post disclaimers that Alphas now use a slow, debug kernel and has
high memory requirements. I believe F18 was the first to have a debug
kernel/high RAM, correct? That's 17 previous releases that people were
used to a "normal speed" system to te
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:12:05PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or
> >'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on
> >installed systems.
>
> When you
On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or
'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on
installed systems.
When you want the mass public to test the image you produced, it doesn't
help when it is a
On 18/04/13 04:41 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
19 Alpha RC4 _x86_64 net install with Gnome Desktop installs no problem
on Fedora 17 KVM on a dual-core 2GHz with 2GB RAM.
Took a while & the 'Green Screen of Nearly Death' on boot & shutdown was
particularly tedious but I put that
rmal. I guess I'll check the 32-bit
images boot here - I use a very similar VM for testing. In the mean
time, can you check your download is good? There are sha256sums for the
RC4 images here:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC4/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-19-Alpha-
On 04/17/2013 02:35 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
> oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
>
> As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4
> (RC4) is now available for t
amil, thanks for trying (and hopefully succeeding later
on) to help me
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 18/04/13 02:07 AM, moshe nahmias wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso
>> <http://dl.fedoraproject.org/
On 18/04/13 02:07 AM, moshe nahmias wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso
<http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC4/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso>
from the link above on virt on fedora 18.
The install don't work.
It says that dracut-in
I run virt via the graphic menu on mate.
I use the default installation of virtual machine manager (as far as I
remember) version number 0.9.5.
Since I am pretty sure I didn't give the details you want...
What exactly do you want to know? And how to get the info?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:08 PM,
> Hi,
> I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso from the link above on virt
> on fedora 18.
> The install don't work.
> It says that dracut-initqueue[284] could not boot because /dev/root doesn't
> exist.
What virt tools do you use? How do you run it?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedor
to install
> Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso<http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC4/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso>from
> the link above on virt on fedora 18.
> The install don't work.
> It says that dracut-initqueue[284] could not boot because /d
Hi,
I tried to install
Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso<http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC4/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso>from
the link above on virt on fedora 18.
The install don't work.
It says that dracut-initqueue[284] could not boot because /dev/r
t-announce
Verschickt: Mi, 17 Apr 2013 9:33 pm
Betreff: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alp
On 17/04/13 10:53 PM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
" Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso
<https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC4/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso>
17-Apr-2013 02:24 709M ", this build seems to be the same code as the
last build(s). Suc
t-announce
Verschickt: Mi, 17 Apr 2013 9:33 pm
Betreff: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available
Now!
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alp
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https
Hi,
at today's supplementary Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to
ship RC4 (release candidate) as the final release [1].
#agreed to ship RC4 as final release (with no votes against)
The release date is Tuesday, January 15, 2013!
Big thanks goes to everyone who helped with this RC3/RC4
te
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 20:32 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Downloading the Live media 64 bit now ... will try an install once
> it's pushed to a USB stick. I can also run anything in a VMware 9,
> VirtualBox 4.2.6, F18 Virtual Machine Manager or Windows 8 Pro Client
> Hyper-V guest. Is Wind
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
N2469R:
> RC4 is missing Wine and TigerVNC.
The Xfce spin never shipped wine or TigerVNC, actually I am not aware of
any spin or media that ships them and if, it would have been more than
10 MB difference in size.
Kind reg
ere. The second most likely place is inside any of the livecd
> desktop environments (kde, gnome, xfce etc.).
I have tested Xfce and lightdm and things are fine with both RC4 and
RC3. However I'd like to ask you if we can go for RC4, because ...
> To that end, if you have the time to d
RC4 is missing Wine and TigerVNC.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430
--
te
We find ourselves in a bit of an odd position for Fedora 18 - RC3 is
go, but we need to finalize some testing in order to decide whether or
not RC4 will supersede RC3 as the released version of Fedora 18.
To that end, we have some testing to do. Since the change between RC2
and RC4 is so small
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:25 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 16:49 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/06/12 16:32, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Frank Murphy gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>
> >> If your are using ligthdm, slowness is known:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834427
> >
> > My Rawhide is a VirtualBox guest (which u
Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes:
> There was recently a bug like that, where I had to set selinux to permissive
> to be able to login in (or see the gdm background screen) as gdm was blocking
> being unable to access a file it needed. This was about 1 to 2 weeks ago
> though, so I don't think
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 16:10 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes:
>
> > > Should have mentioned that my Rawhide is a VirtualBox 4.1.18 guest (which
> > > uses the vesa driver).
Nope:
> I booted in graphical mode, then when the black screen with the et
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 16:10:40 +,
Andre Robatino wrote:
I booted in graphical mode, then when the black screen with the eternal spinning
cursor appeared, switched to VT3 and grabbed Xorg.0.log - see
http://robatino.fedorapeople.org/Xorg.0.log . The file grows gradually, so this
is just a
Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes:
> > Should have mentioned that my Rawhide is a VirtualBox 4.1.18 guest (which
> > uses the vesa driver).
>
> Assuming the guest still brings up networking, you should be able to ssh
> into it and inspect /var/log/Xorg.0.log. Alternatively I assume vbox
> has ser
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 14:48:31 +,
Andre Robatino wrote:
I am not able to boot either of the Rawhide 3.5.0-0.rc4 kernels in runlevel 3
(adding "3" to the boot options). Since booting in default graphical mode has
resulted for me in a black screen immediately after X starts
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
