Re: Question about an automated check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-06-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 06:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:27:27 -0500, > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:46:00 +0200, > > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > > If this package was honouring $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, the contents of > > > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS w

Re: Question about an automated check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-06-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:27:27 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:46:00 +0200, > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > If this package was honouring $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, the contents of > > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS would be found inside of this compiler call. > > Thanks. I wrongly assum

Re: Question about an automated check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-06-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:46:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > If this package was honouring $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, the contents of > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS would be found inside of this compiler call. Thanks. I wrongly assumed that setting the CXX flags would result in them getting used. I'll take a dee

Re: Question about an automated check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-06-02 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/03/2011 06:19 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I have a bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710288) > that claims that manaworld 0.0.29 used $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but that the > recent 0.5.2 didn't. Unless there is something subtle it looks like the > 0.5.2 is using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.

Question about an automated check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-06-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I have a bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710288) that claims that manaworld 0.0.29 used $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but that the recent 0.5.2 didn't. Unless there is something subtle it looks like the 0.5.2 is using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. One notable difference that I think might have bearing