On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:30:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> What do you think of the idea of directly contacting people who apply
> without sending a self-intro mail?
The only issue I can think of with that is you are potentially giving
your email to a spammer. Otherwise, I like it.
Jo
On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 13:35 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> Personally, I'm a bit hesitant to sponsor someone that has not sent an
> introduction email. I also check to see if they're on IRC, and if I
> see neither, I'm a bit hesitant to sponsor them. If I see them on IRC
> but don't see an email,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 05:28:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well we're definitely out of scope now...but for some key personnel
> (people with admin access to key servers and so on), we actually do
> need as many contact methods as possible. If there's a massive hack or
> a huge security iss
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 16:48 -0600, Viorel Tabara wrote:
> On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case.
>
> What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal
> information
> spammers
On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case.
What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal information
spammers will never reveal.
--
Viorel
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraprojec
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:08:49 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't
> actually check - I should have.
>
> Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll
> come up with a separate proposal for that.
Note that the one c
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 15:54 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we
> > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already,
> > but I didn't!) in the joi
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we
> became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already,
> but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to
> qa group moderators/spons
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:22 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Uh, wouldn't the addition of a "captcha" on the signup page make
> joining up without requiring additional group memberships easier and
> more bot-proof? That would also prevent the sponsors having to deal
> with a slew of botted initial con
On 08/05/2016 12:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we
> became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already,
> but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa
> group moderators/sponsors, but I fi
Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we
became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already,
but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa
group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make everyone
aware.
Recently,
11 matches
Mail list logo