Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-12 Thread moshe nahmias
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 07/02/13 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > >> OK, I think its being my mistake... >>> Is the bug id section is to define which bug is the blocker/freeze >>> exception? >>> If so then my comment is wrong on my part. >>> >> >> This is a good

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On 07/02/13 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: OK, I think its being my mistake... Is the bug id section is to define which bug is the blocker/freeze exception? If so then my comment is wrong on my part. This is a good feedback. When I think about it, the label could be much clearer if we use "Propo

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-07 Thread Kamil Paral
> OK, I think its being my mistake... > Is the bug id section is to define which bug is the blocker/freeze > exception? > If so then my comment is wrong on my part. This is a good feedback. When I think about it, the label could be much clearer if we use "Proposed bug number" (or similar) instead

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-06 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:22:47 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > > I have the first draft of the form done and up as a demo at: > > http://209.132.184.160/blockerbugs/propose_bug > > "Bugzilla User" field is confusing. What user? I'd label it "Your > Bugzilla login" or something similar. Yeah, I'

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-05 Thread moshe nahmias
OK, I think its being my mistake... Is the bug id section is to define which bug is the blocker/freeze exception? If so then my comment is wrong on my part. I thought we don't need the bug id (mixed up the idea of bug id with when reporting on a new bug). On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Tim Flin

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-05 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 19:04:20 +0200 moshe nahmias wrote: > What is the point of the bugzilla ID? > I think that the best way to do it is to assign a number that will be > eventually the ID for the bug in this field if its needed on the form > (though i don't know how easy it will be to do it). I'm

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-05 Thread moshe nahmias
What is the point of the bugzilla ID? I think that the best way to do it is to assign a number that will be eventually the ID for the bug in this field if its needed on the form (though i don't know how easy it will be to do it). -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: ht

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-02-04 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:52:13 -0700 Tim Flink wrote: > Everything is still very much in the early stages of planning, so > constructive comments and suggestions (or contributions) would > certainly be appreciated. I have the first draft of the form done and up as a demo at: http://209.132.184.1

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Tim Flink
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:47:31 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > > The current idea is to login with FAS and do one of two things > > 1. populate the field with the user's FAS email (assuming that > > bugzilla cc doesn't require a registered user) > > Unfortunately this doesn't work, I just tr

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> The current idea is to login with FAS and do one of two things > 1. populate the field with the user's FAS email (assuming that > bugzilla cc doesn't require a registered user) Unfortunately this doesn't work, I just tried it. The email must match a registered BZ account. -- test mailing

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> > > * I don't understand the "Release Number" in the HTML form much. > > > We're working on a single release at a time. What's the purpose? > > > > The thought was to support proposing blockers against the next > > release, > > not just the release which is currently under development. Not sure

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 10:02 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:53:35 -0500 (EST) > Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > [1] http://tirfa.com/proposing-blocker-bugs.html > > > > * I agree that we need FAS<->Bugzilla integration, not just for this > > purpose, but for many purposes. I think a

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-24 Thread Tim Flink
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:53:35 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > > [1] http://tirfa.com/proposing-blocker-bugs.html > > * I agree that we need FAS<->Bugzilla integration, not just for this > purpose, but for many purposes. I think a simple additional field in > FAS where you could specify your Bugz

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-24 Thread Kamil Paral
> [1] http://tirfa.com/proposing-blocker-bugs.html * I agree that we need FAS<->Bugzilla integration, not just for this purpose, but for many purposes. I think a simple additional field in FAS where you could specify your Bugzilla login would be a great step forward. But ideally you would as we

Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-23 Thread Tim Flink
After FUDCon last weekend and some other conversations that I've had (mostly over IRC), we're planning to implement a more user-friendly bug submission system in the blocker tracking app. I put the details that I have now in the form of a blog post [1] if anyone is interested. The version that wil