- Original Message -
> On 09/04/2012 02:42 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 09/04/2012 02:19 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
> >
> > Only set partition defaults should be necessary to working for
> > alpha
> >
>
On 09/04/2012 02:42 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 09/04/2012 02:19 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
Only set partition defaults should be necessary to working for alpha
2. Mate desktop install choice
We already have define
On 09/04/2012 02:19 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
Only set partition defaults should be necessary to working for alpha
2. Mate desktop install choice
We already have defined alpha criteria for desktops which Mate falls
under (
Hi,
On Po, 2012-09-03 at 19:19 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
>
> 1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
We already have criteria, which demands usable partitioning. In
different phases we want different feat
On 2012-09-03 19:27, Larry Brower wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/03/2012 09:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
2. Mate desktop install choice
On 2012-09-03 19:19, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
2. Mate desktop install choice
1 because Fedora needs to be a real Linux, not a toy
At the time of the major revision to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/03/2012 09:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
>
> 1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
> 2. Mate desktop install choice
>
> 1 because Fedora needs to be a
I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
2. Mate desktop install choice
1 because Fedora needs to be a real Linux, not a toy
2 to add a bit of excitement among Linux boffins (including Linus?)
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N246
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:04 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Agreed. Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the criteria [1] with
> your proposed rewording. We can of course revisit should any problems
> surface.
Yup, I think it's one of those where we'll get a feel for it as we go
along and run int
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:35 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > The asymmetry there was intentional and I sort of like it; I think it's
> > > a bigger problem if we install to your type of storage then shut it down
> > > uncleanly than if w
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > We also need a test case for this, of course.
> >
> > Good point. Unless anyone else wants a shot at it, I'll draft something
> > up shortly and send to the list for review.
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > We also need a test case for this, of course.
>
> Good point. Unless anyone else wants a shot at it, I'll draft something
> up shortly and send to the list for review.
Oh, do note that we test shut down / restart from login manager and
d
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:35 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > The asymmetry there was intentional and I sort of like it; I think it's
> > a bigger problem if we install to your type of storage then shut it down
> > uncleanly than if we just don't install to it. But on the other hand,
> > you could arg
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > s,systems',system's,g
> >
> > Doh, thanks :)
> >
> > > I think we don't really need reboot to work; shut down and then turn
> > > back on is a fine workaround at Alpha phase.
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > s,systems',system's,g
>
> Doh, thanks :)
>
> > I think we don't really need reboot to work; shut down and then turn
> > back on is a fine workaround at Alpha phase. If there was a bug in
> > rebooting, but shutting down worked, I'd probab
Subject: Re: Proposed Alpha criteria adjustments
From: jla...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:56:38 -0400
>On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, Ja
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
> > entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions
> > methods, with or w
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
> entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions
> methods, with or without encryption enabled
>
> I propose the following minor adjust
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action
> item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria.
>
> Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer
> partitioning-related Al
Greetings,
During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action
item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria.
Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer
partitioning-related Alpha criteria could be adjusted slightly to
accommodate the new "[ ]
20 matches
Mail list logo
