On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the develope
>
>
> From: Adam Williamson
> To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:22:21 -0700
> Subject: Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
&g
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the develope
On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> when they arrive is a function of the developers, we don't have much
> control over it =)
That is a bit of a
> > So, we have the choice of waiting for all blockers to be resolved before
> > we do the next compose, which might take a while, or doing a TC2 with
> > the most critical fixes in. What approach do people think we should
> > take? Would a TC2 have any value or should we just clean up all the
> >
On 08/03/2011 07:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, we have the choice of waiting for all blockers to be resolved before
> we do the next compose, which might take a while, or doing a TC2 with
> the most critical fixes in. What approach do people think we should
> take? Would a TC2 have any value
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> > for post-Alpha TC1.
> >
> > We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> > have a lot of
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:21 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> Honestly I rather having the extra TC build to weed out any potential
> blocker that could arise during fixing and spinning of the known blockers.
> I've seen that happen in the past and an extra spin can help make sure RC is
> better at the s
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Why did this happen? What went wrong? The strategy should be based on
> that.
James and Adam have already begun to outline some of the reasons on
the F16 QA Retrospective page on the wiki. Everyone is welcome to add
their input to that pa
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:11:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
>> for post-Alpha TC1.
>>
>> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
>> have a lot of block
On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> for post-Alpha TC1.
>
> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
Why did this hap
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:41:09 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> for post-Alpha TC1.
>
> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
>
> By p
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I suspect this is vacation time for many, so a longer slip might be in
> the offing.
No-one gets any vacation while there are still open blockers. ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | id
Honestly I rather having the extra TC build to weed out any potential
blocker that could arise during fixing and spinning of the known blockers.
I've seen that happen in the past and an extra spin can help make sure RC is
better at the start.
-- John Watzke
On Aug 3, 2011 8:12 PM, "Clyde E. Kun
On 08/03/2011 08:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> for post-Alpha TC1.
>
> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
>
> By policy, we
I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
for post-Alpha TC1.
We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
By policy, we can't call a build an RC until all known blockers are
fixe
16 matches
Mail list logo
