On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 12:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:42 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the
> issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode."
> >
> > Debug mode is intended to be used by dev
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:42 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
> > installer must be also able to access debug mode."
>
> Debug mode is intended to be used by developers to test and fix
> anaconda. I don't think this belongs
> "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
> installer must be also able to access debug mode."
Debug mode is intended to be used by developers to test and fix
anaconda. I don't think this belongs in test criteria.
- Chris
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:46:45 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for reporting failure of installer and accessing
> debug mode
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:29 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose final criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the
> issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode."
>
> We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
>
>
I propose final criterion:
"The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
installer must be also able to access debug mode."
We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_
