#285: gnome-shell + extensions test day
---+---
Reporter: vbenes| Owner:
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Test
#285: gnome-shell + extensions test day
---+---
Reporter: vbenes| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: Test Day
#285: gnome-shell + extensions test day
--+
Reporter: vbenes| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords: Test Day | Blocked By:
Blocking
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:14:03 +0200, JB (Joachim) wrote:
> I installed all available gnome-shell extensions:
[...]
> But actually, gnome-tweak-tool shows no extensions in the submenu "Shell
> extensions".
>
> Anybody sees this too?
No, a few I installed have been list
I installed all available gnome-shell extensions:
gnome-shell-extension-auto-move-windows-3.1.4-3.20110830git6b5e3a3e.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro-0-0.2.git13030cd.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-alternate-tab-3.1.4-3.20110830git6b5e3a3e.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-remove
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 08:46 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
>
> I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
> upstream choices as much as possible.
Either way, such
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
upstream choices as much as possible.
If alternative choices are useful for a significant population of Fedora
users, these s
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> installed by default typically. From what I hear in the desktop
> summit, Owen Taylor seems to be interested in providing a power off
> option directly for the next version of GNOME and that should solve this
> particular concern
When you say "next version"
On 08/08/2011 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> What prompted me to suggest this was the comment
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457#c74 referring to
> http://www.golem.de/1108/85539.html (German article). Google's German
> translation isn't very readable but AFAICT it seemed to con
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> As the maintainer and use of this extension, I don't think Fedora
> should be installing extensions by default. As a general principle, if
> some extension is so popular that it must be installed by default to
> provide a better experience for end user, this
On 08/08/2011 02:16 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..."
On 08/08/2011 08:46 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..."
On 08/08/2011 05:19 PM, Alexjan Carraturo wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
>> I'm considering filing a bug for
>> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
>> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
>> including
>> myse
Additional info: it's not currently on the install DVDs, but after a default
install, installing it only drags in gnome-shell-extensions-common. Both
packages are of negligible size (6.5K and 19K).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having
I'm considering filing a bug for gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
to be included in a default installation, considering that most users, including
myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use the
Alt key), and I haven't seen anyone
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 11:35 PM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
> >
> >
> > Also, since the last update, the drive-menu icon is being shown
> > perennially even without any external drives being mounted. When i
> > click on it, its showing the hard drive pa
On 05/31/2011 11:35 PM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
>
>
> Also, since the last update, the drive-menu icon is being shown
> perennially even without any external drives being mounted. When i
> click on it, its showing the hard drive partitions which i have
> mounted from /etc/fstab .. This wasnt the beha
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > Works just fine here. What version of GNOME Shell and this extension
> > are you using?
> >
> > $ rpm -q gnome-shell gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu
On 05/31/2011 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension :
>> gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description :
>>
>> "
On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension :
> gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description :
>
> " Adds a menu in the system status area that tracks removable disk
> d
Hello,
In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension :
gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description :
" Adds a menu in the system status area that tracks removable disk
devices attached and offers to browse them and eject/unmount them "
However
On 04/12/2011 09:49 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hope that helps. One thing that'd be nice if experimental extensions
> could be disabled by default and would only be enabled if added to a
> hypothetical org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions key.
Every single extension is a sub package that you have
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 03:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 08:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Nice job. They are very useful. My personal preference is not to have
> > the dock extension however. I find it distracting in its current
> > incarnation.
>
> I think it sorts of serv
On 04/11/2011 08:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Nice job. They are very useful. My personal preference is not to have
> the dock extension however. I find it distracting in its current
> incarnation.
I think it sorts of serves a temporary clutch till you get used to the
new workflow in GNOME
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:29:47 -0400, Clyde wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 10:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> > break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
> >
> > https:/
On 04/10/2011 10:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extensions-3.0.0-4.6d56cfgit.fc15
>
On 04/11/2011 07:35 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
> So, currently I see no way of configuring, say, the new doc (position,
> etc) other than install or remove the packages?
No such options at this time.
> gnome-tweek-tool does not give me anything new.
Other than the user theme extension, no other e
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:28 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
> break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extensions-3.0.0-4.6d56cfgit
Hi
Feel free to play around and ask if you have any questions. If you
break your login, well that's part of the fun! :-)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extensions-3.0.0-4.6d56cfgit.fc15
Rahul
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
30 matches
Mail list logo
