On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 23:42:04 +0530,
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> Ok, but what good is a build if it has not been pushed out through
> bodhi? Couldn't we have another option, like successful builds being
> auto-pushed or something? I know that auto-pushing is probably not a
> very good idea
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:52:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0530,
> Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> >
> > I had just started working on this, but I noticed that in some cases
> > the builds were not pushed as updates. Should these be closed as
> > CURRENTREL
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0530,
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> I had just started working on this, but I noticed that in some cases
> the builds were not pushed as updates. Should these be closed as
> CURRENTRELEASE?
When I was getting more time to work on this I was doing things both w
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:29:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:04:50 +0300,
> Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > Hi testers,
> > This is stronly a developer request.
> > I'm watching the FTBFS list in bugzilla because I'm trying to fix base java
> > FTBFS using my prov
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:04:50 +0300,
Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> Hi testers,
> This is stronly a developer request.
> I'm watching the FTBFS list in bugzilla because I'm trying to fix base java
> FTBFS using my provenpackager status. But the list currently is more than 200
> bugs which make
Hi testers,
This is stronly a developer request.
I'm watching the FTBFS list in bugzilla because I'm trying to fix base java
FTBFS using my provenpackager status. But the list currently is more than 200
bugs which makes it a bit hard to follow. And there are a number of bugs that
have been fixed
