On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:21:59 +0200
drago01 wrote:
>> Stop wasting everyone's time by trying to solve a non existent
> problem, thanks.
How is it wasting time.
Already I have found out that,
there was a change beween F17-18.
That at-spi is hooked into atk by default.
That is new, now if you fee
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 26/10/12 16:31, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
If the F18 install I just did is any indication, the state it ships in
is as off as it gets.
>>>
>>>
>>> So you agree, it's unneccessary.
>>
>>
>> What a dishonest thing to say. I'd appreciat
On 26/10/12 16:31, Adam Jackson wrote:
If the F18 install I just did is any indication, the state it ships in
is as off as it gets.
So you agree, it's unneccessary.
What a dishonest thing to say. I'd appreciate it if you didn't put
words in my mouth, thanks.
- ajax
Is it necessary for me
On 10/26/12 3:33 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/10/12 22:49, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 22:21 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
I agree, but I don't need it,
Wheres the script to turn if off?
Everone else has to figure that out themselves.
accessibilty.conf has no on=0\false switch.
If
On 26/10/12 14:59, Richard Ryniker wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote on Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:33:25 +0100:
So you agree, it's unneccessary.
For me to need at-spi*. Point made.
I think the point was at-spi is part of GTK, but this part is not
something it is reasonable to package separately,
It was p
Frank Murphy wrote on Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:33:25 +0100:
>So you agree, it's unneccessary.
>For me to need at-spi*. Point made.
I think the point was at-spi is part of GTK, but this part is not
something it is reasonable to package separately, such as a language
package or some esoteric locale. T
On 25/10/12 22:49, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 22:21 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
I agree, but I don't need it,
Wheres the script to turn if off?
Everone else has to figure that out themselves.
accessibilty.conf has no on=0\false switch.
If the F18 install I just did is any indica
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 22:21 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> I agree, but I don't need it,
> Wheres the script to turn if off?
> Everone else has to figure that out themselves.
> accessibilty.conf has no on=0\false switch.
If the F18 install I just did is any indication, the state it ships in
is as o
On 25/10/12 21:23, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 20:33 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/10/12 17:01, Matthias Clasen wrote:
at-spi* is not an app though. It is a central piece of desktop infrastructure.
Why?
Because treating those who do need accessibility as second-class
citi
On 25/10/12 15:45, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like gtk3 depends on something provided by at-spi-*
and a lot of stuff needs gtk3 :)
Tim
Yeah, I'll work through those and see what I can dump.
Might be a good learning experience.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test maili
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 20:33 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/10/12 17:01, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > at-spi* is not an app though. It is a central piece of desktop
> > infrastructure.
> >
>
> Why?
Because treating those who do need accessibility as second-class
citizens means they inevitabl
On 25/10/12 17:01, Matthias Clasen wrote:
at-spi* is not an app though. It is a central piece of desktop infrastructure.
Why?, thankfully, I do not need accessability.
So I need to remove the desktop.
Job done.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
- Original Message -
> On 25/10/12 16:24, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > Its not optional anymore.
> >
> > Lets take a step back - why do you want to remove it ?
>
> The same reason I remove all other apps, I don't use.
> Which is I don't use them.
at-spi* is not an app though. It is a c
On 25/10/12 16:24, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Its not optional anymore.
Lets take a step back - why do you want to remove it ?
The same reason I remove all other apps, I don't use.
Which is I don't use them.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.or
- Original Message -
> On 25/10/12 15:33, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > I guess that would be because of
> > https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/AccessibilityOnByDefault
>
> How do I get rid of it.
> or at least disable it, in a way that doesn't disable the box.
> Aside from rpm -e -
Since the gtk3 configure.ac lists a hard dependency on atk, I guess
you can't (unless you can rid the system of gtk3)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/10/12 15:33, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>> I guess that would be because of
>> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Featu
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Why does at-spi(-atk, -core)
> want to pull out 80+ pkgs from my F18.
>
> In F16\17 they only removed themselves.
> (at-spi, at-spi-core)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Frank
> "Jack of all, fubars"
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 25/10/12 15:33, Sandro Mani wrote:
I guess that would be because of
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/AccessibilityOnByDefault
How do I get rid of it.
or at least disable it, in a way that doesn't disable the box.
Aside from rpm -e --nodeps, reluctance on my part.
--
Regards,
I guess that would be because of
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/AccessibilityOnByDefault
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Why does at-spi(-atk, -core)
> want to pull out 80+ pkgs from my F18.
>
> In F16\17 they only removed themselves.
> (at-spi, at-spi-core)
Why does at-spi(-atk, -core)
want to pull out 80+ pkgs from my F18.
In F16\17 they only removed themselves.
(at-spi, at-spi-core)
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
20 matches
Mail list logo
