X still gets locked up when resuming from suspend for a Radeon X800
based upon the R430 chip and using the R300 Gallium driver. There is a
corresponding bug report (643700) but there has been no activity for
half a year after this issue had shown up for the first time under F14
whereas everything w
When installing over the network and providing IP address through boot
options I noticed in the log a message saying it couldn't find
updates.img with the reason "name resolution error". As I did not expect
to load a updates.img this didn't effect me. But further on in the
installation I saw no
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:27:24AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 03:20 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
> >> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:00:03AM +0800, bsfmig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> As it was a virtual machine (I guess that's the reason) Gnome 3 failed
> to load. I then enabled 3D acceleration in VBox and gave it the
> maximum allowable memory (128M
On 03/31/2011 03:20 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
>> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and that in /etc/sudoers,
>> wheel is already able to execute all commands
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > > > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an i
Just did a new install on a netbook--this time I went for my usual
minimal installation. It failed on bind-libs. This strikes me as ood
for two reasons--why would bind-libs be included in a minimal
installation, and why would it cause the installation to fail?
I thought I had seen, somewhere a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and that in /etc/sudoers,
> wheel is already able to execute all commands (whereas in the past, that
> line was commented out
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:26:13PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
>
> I've seen quite a few comparison reviews and so on, so I'm not sure we'd
> be providing anything new by doing another evaluation.
To side with Adam on this, most reviews are dated within 3 months
anyway. Seriously, evil
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:44:00PM +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 19:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Selecting the NTP checkbox during firstboot should probably bring up a
> > network connection if one isn't already up, though.
> Kindly please provide me with the web address where I
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 19:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The differences between various virt suites are pretty well known,
> > really...
>
> Well I was personally thinking about graphical application usage
> comparison against virt-ma
On 03/30/2011 06:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The differences between various virt suites are pretty well known,
> really...
Well I was personally thinking about graphical application usage
comparison against virt-manager but since you mentioned that the
differences is well know then there is
On 03/30/2011 06:44 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Kindly please provide me with the web address where I may find this
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tes
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 18:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >>> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso
On 30/03/2011 19:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>>> Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
>>>
>>> No glitches encountered during the install.
>>>
>>> On
On 03/30/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
>> Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
>> in
On 03/30/2011 05:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Selecting the NTP checkbox during firstboot should probably bring up a
> network connection if one isn't already up, though.
Hum not sure that would be something we wanted as in application to have
the control start and stop over network connection
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
>
> Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
> interested in people trying out kvm virtualizatio
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:14 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> As it was a virtual machine (I guess that's the reason) Gnome 3 failed
> to load. I then enabled 3D acceleration in VBox and gave it the
> maximum allowable memory (128MB), and tried again. (This doesn't
> affect me in real life, where I
On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
interested in people trying out kvm virtualization to give our own
products better testing.
--
Eric Blake eb
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
> > >
> > > No glitches encountered d
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
> >
> > No glitches encountered during the install.
> >
> > One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
>
> No glitches encountered during the install.
>
> One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during the install so firstboot
> isn't
> network connected for the NTP
Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
No glitches encountered during the install.
One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during the install so firstboot
isn't
network connected for the NTP setup dialogue.
Looks good to me.
--
G.Wolfe Woodbury
aka redwolfe (p
24 matches
Mail list logo