-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/2010 07:29 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
>> List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
>
> [16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
> before bodhi changed it back [to ON_QA]...do we need to re-test those?
>
>
> [16:19:47] re
- "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 04:57 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > - "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> >
> >>> List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
> >>
> >> [16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
> >> before bodhi changed it back [to ON_QA]...do we n
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 17:24 +0200, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
>
> On 10/19/2010 04:57 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > - "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> >
> >>> List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
> >>
> >> [16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
> >> before bodhi changed it
On 10/19/2010 04:57 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
>
>>> List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
>>
>> [16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
>> before bodhi changed it back [to ON_QA]...do we need to re-test
>> those?
>>
>>
>> [16:19:47] red_a
- "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> > List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
>
> [16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
> before bodhi changed it back [to ON_QA]...do we need to re-test
> those?
>
>
> [16:19:47] red_alert: I think that's a really good
> discussion
> for
> List of ON_QA bugs - http://bit.ly/dx4ehO
[16:17:55] many of those ON_QA bugs have been VERIFIED
before bodhi changed it back [to ON_QA]...do we need to re-test those?
[16:19:47] red_alert: I think that's a really good discussion
for the list. kparal mentioned that earlier, let's discuss it
Greetings folks,
As we wait for the F-14-RC1 compose, there are several blocker bugs
current in need of verification. I have included a URL and the list of
bugs below. If you have time, please take a moment to provide test
feedback in bugzilla.
Please note, some of the issues are related to the
