On 07/08/2011 03:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
>>> If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
>>> multiple release cycles
>> How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
>> etc... ? We have that n
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:49 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > > >
> > > > arch for each mi
On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > >
> > > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> > > of du
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
> > > multiple release cycles
> >
> > How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
> >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> > of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only
> > highlight th
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
> > multiple release cycles
>
> How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
> etc... ? We have that now, I just didn't include any details about how
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:24 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > 4. Inline exceptions - No new pages created, simply modify the
> > existing criteria pages to indicate which arches criteria apply
> > for (example at [4])
>
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 21:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 08:24 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
> > architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s390x for now) to leverage our
> > existing rel
> 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only
> highlight the differences between the primary and secondary
> arch.
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:24 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> 4. Inline exceptions - No new pages created, simply modify the
> existing criteria pages to indicate which arches criteria apply
> for (example at [4])
> * PROS - No new wiki pages to create, just adding con
On 07/07/2011 08:24 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
> architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s390x for now) to leverage our
> existing release criteria [2]. This isn't really a tremendously
> difficult technical cha
Greetings folks,
I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s390x for now) to leverage our
existing release criteria [2]. This isn't really a tremendously
difficult technical challenge, more of a content organization conundrum.
The
12 matches
Mail list logo
