rrect place to mention this
>> or if it should be brought up on the infrastructure list.
>
> As noted on infrastructure list:
>
> Short answer: Yes. We know they are currently not working for f26.
>
> Long answer: With the addition of alternative arches in f26, we cannot
>
st.
As noted on infrastructure list:
Short answer: Yes. We know they are currently not working for f26.
Long answer: With the addition of alternative arches in f26, we cannot
do drpms the same way as we used to, because some of the packages are
under fedora-secondary and some are under fedora. We
Hi, guys.
I don't know if this is the correct forum for this, but over on the
users' list people have been talking about the fact there haven't been
any delta RPMs released for F26 updates. For those of us who don't have
download limits, this isn't a problem. However, many people do have
these lim
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 12:26 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > […]
>
> I don't believe drpms are generated for rawhide. I'm not sure they
> ever
> have been.
DRPMs were generated in the past (not quite sure when they stopped,
possibly when f25 started). They
> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> Right. They are not at all, no matter how much I might like it from
KF> the server side. ;)
You and me both.
If only we could get them broken up into subdirectories like the
packages are. But then you have to fix two different createrepo
codebases.
- J<
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:26:38 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "RW" == Russel Winder writes:
>
> RW> From what I can see DRPMs for Rawhide have not been picked up by
> RW> the mirrors for quite a long time now.
>
> I don't
>>>>> "RW" == Russel Winder writes:
RW> From what I can see DRPMs for Rawhide have not been picked up by the
RW> mirrors for quite a long time now.
I don't believe drpms are generated for rawhide. I'm not sure they ever
have been.
RW> Does this
From what I can see DRPMs for Rawhide have not been picked up by the
mirrors for quite a long time now. Does this mean that the DRPM system
is being abandoned?
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644046 to find out quickly
whether this is a bug in xz or not, since the new version hasn't been pushed to
F14 and below yet.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/te
A new version of xz (xz-4.999.9-0.3.beta.212.gacbc.fc15) was built and pushed to
Rawhide on October 16. Today, I saw several "md5sum mismatch of result" errors
in rebuilding drpms. In each case, the drpm rebuild failed if and only if the
corresponding new rpm was built before the xz up
10 matches
Mail list logo
