On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:45:43 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> I think you're looking at the wrong time period.
I don't think so, but it's possible. :)
> libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23
> went to stable on 2015-11-23 (see
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9199a1bfe1 ). At
> this time,
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 07:45:43PM -, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I think you're looking at the wrong time period. libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23
> went to stable on 2015-11-23 (see
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9199a1bfe1 ). At
> this time, 1.6.17-3 had already been pushed to testing
I think you're looking at the wrong time period. libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23 went to
stable on 2015-11-23 (see
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9199a1bfe1 ). At this time,
1.6.17-3 had already been pushed to testing and was just sitting there. Then it
was submitted for stable on 201
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 18:54:29 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> I don't see which of those apply for any of the three packages in the
> bug. Are you sure you're not talking about the old bodhi? --
Wed Nov 18 02:23:16 2015: libpng-1.6.17-3.fc23 tagged into
f23-updates-candidate by phracek
Wed Nov 1
I don't see which of those apply for any of the three packages in the bug. Are
you sure you're not talking about the old bodhi?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:51:15 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> > Sorry on the qemu front, but I was under the impression that bodhi
> > handles obsoleting old updates when a new version is submitted. Am
> > I wrong, or is something busted on the bodhi side?
It does, except in several cases:
1)
> Sorry on the qemu front, but I was under the impression that bodhi handles
> obsoleting old updates when a new version is submitted. Am I wrong, or is
> something busted on the bodhi side?
See the bug. The downgrades happened when old updates were submitted for
stable, either by the packager su
On 01/09/2016 01:15 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The stable versions of qemu, libpng, and just now bzip2 have been downgraded
> in F23 (although qemu has been fixed). See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292914 . It would be a good
> idea for packagers to keep track of what the latest
The stable versions of qemu, libpng, and just now bzip2 have been downgraded
in F23 (although qemu has been fixed). See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292914 . It would be a good
idea for packagers to keep track of what the latest stable version of their
package is, and not submit old
