Re: A plea to proventesters

2011-07-08 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 07/08/2011 05:40 AM, drago01 wrote: > Well the proper fix is to disable auto push if there is any negative vote. > The maintainer should then have to push it by hand (or if necessary > provide an updated package instead of letting it get pushed). https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618 -- te

Re: A plea to proventesters

2011-07-08 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote: > >> > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters", >> > >> > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major >> > flaw in the test update, please

Re: A plea to proventesters

2011-07-08 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote: > > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters", > > > > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major > > flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the > > time to verify the -1,

Re: A plea to proventesters

2011-07-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters", > > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major > flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the > time to verify the -1, pleas

A plea to proventesters

2011-07-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters", if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the time to verify the -1, please vote at most +0. Thank you! https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update