On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 10:18 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 20 January 2015 at 06:30, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately these updates don't fix Bug 1178978 - offline update
> > fails due
> > to separate /var volume mounting too late
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178978
On Tue Jan 20 2015 at 3:20:41 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It would be great if folks could, as a matter of urgency, test this
> update:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif-
> 0.1.8-1.fc21
>
> Please install the updated packages, reboot (or at least restart t
On 20 January 2015 at 06:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Unfortunately these updates don't fix Bug 1178978 - offline update fails due
> to separate /var volume mounting too late
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178978
Right. This isn't actually a PackageKit bug as you correctly deduced.
I
On 20 January 2015 at 09:50, Tim Waugh wrote:
> But: will all Fedora 21 users need to run 'pkcon repair' manually, or
> can that be made automatic?
It shouldn't be required, unless someone has rpmdb index corruption
and doesn't want to reboot.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproj
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 12:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Please install the updated packages, reboot (or at least restart the
> packagekit service), run 'pkcon repair' as root, reboot again, and
> then test regular use of GNOME Software and pkcon as much as possible -
> try installing and remo
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Can you check you didn't get a split PackageKit / libhif update? And
> if you were testing from a clean install and just installed the PK /
> libhif update, also update librepo? If it's none of those things, add a
> note on the update
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 20:28 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Jonathan Calloway <
> jonathancallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Please install the updated packages, reboot (or at least restart
> > the packagekit service), run 'pkcon repair' as root,
>
>
> # pkcon
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Jonathan Calloway <
jonathancallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please install the updated packages, reboot (or at least restart the
> packagekit service), run 'pkcon repair' as root,
# pkcon repair
Failed to contact PackageKit: Error calling StartServiceByName for
or
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 22:24 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 17:01 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> > The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found
>
> The original message has a line break.
>
Yup :) Blame the Evolution 3.13 message composer.
In fac
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 17:01 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found
The original message has a line break.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 19 January 2015 at 22:01, Jonathan Calloway
wrote:
> The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif-0.1.8-1.fc21
Richard
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.f
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit
Hi, folks!
We recently found out that there were some significant problems with PackageKit
and things that use it (GNOME Software, Apper, gnome-
packagekit...) in Fedora 21, since the release of libhif-0.1.7 as an
Hi, folks!
We recently found out that there were some significant problems with
PackageKit and things that use it (GNOME Software, Apper, gnome-
packagekit...) in Fedora 21, since the release of libhif-0.1.7 as an
update shortly after F21 came out. The initial bug people noticed was
offline upd
13 matches
Mail list logo
