Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-02 Graphics Test Week recap

2011-03-03 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 18:12 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:20 +, Camilo Mesias wrote: > > Ah sorry, I wasn't following the process then. I tested the iso, > > discussed on IRC and raised a BZ. I haven't updated the wiki before I > > think. I couldn't run any specific t

Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-02 Graphics Test Week recap

2011-03-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:20 +, Camilo Mesias wrote: > Ah sorry, I wasn't following the process then. I tested the iso, > discussed on IRC and raised a BZ. I haven't updated the wiki before I > think. I couldn't run any specific tests anyway because of the bug. As long as the bug's reported, th

Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-02 Graphics Test Week recap

2011-03-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:14 +, Camilo Mesias wrote: > I'm curious about the accounting method. I see there are some Nouveau > bugs listed CLOSED DUPLICATE. I raised one as a result of the test > day, 679404, it was later marked duplicate of 679924 (which is in the > list). > > Just wondering w

[Test-Announce] 2011-02 Graphics Test Week recap

2011-03-02 Thread Adam Williamson
Another Graphics Test Week has gone by, so here's the statistical recap! Participation was back up again to one of its highest levels ever this time, which is great: thanks to everyone who came out and also promoted the event. We got some really solid testing in and already resolved some major iss