On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm less concerned about changes in anaconda's UI if I know kickstart will
continue functioning.
Do I see two volunteers to help fix kickstart bugs? :)
You see two people who are representative of the majority of linux users
in the world - speci
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:39:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I think that may be the case _now_ with our current Anaconda situation, but
the more I think about it, the more strongly I feel about making this the
approach for future releases. When
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:42 PM, John Reiser wrote:
I noticed the post install processing in f16 lasted only
a few seconds, not the seemingly interminable wait
a Fedora 18 install takes.
If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system probe
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:15 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:03:44 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > it would probably help to know what *was* in the update set.
>
> OK, from yum.log:
>
while in this case yum.log is fine. I would like to encourage you to use
the yum hi
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > yum --setopt="protected_multilib=0" blah blah blah
> >
> > which might help in situations where things are already deeply sideways.
>
> worth noting for the record that, as always when using 'force' type
> parameters to a package
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:28 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:20:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > > Dunno if that helps anybody... never a dull moment...
> >
> > When upgrading rawhide from X - use screen.
>
> and also when upg
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:12 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:08:52 -0400
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > > Error: Protected multilib versions:
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
> > >
> >
> > I have no idea what these er
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:09 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:26:44 +0100
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this hassle...
>
> Oh I've never wondered that: It has clearly never been a good
> idea. Starting with the total lack of docume
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:24 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 06:40 +, JB wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could you please interpret what is happening here - why the downgrades ?
> >
> > $ cat /etc/fedora-release
> > Fedora release 16
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 06:40 +, JB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please interpret what is happening here - why the downgrades ?
>
> $ cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 16 (Verne)
>
> $ yum repolist enabled
> ...
> repo id repo name statu
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:06 -0400, Mathieu Bouffard wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 11:08 AM, Nick Jacek wrote:
> > My name is Nick Jacek. This summer I'm an intern at Red Hat, where I'll be
> > working on yum.
>
> Congrats and welcome. :P
> Will you be working on the yum bacon command per chance?
Mathie
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 08:56 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:45, Pasha R wrote:
> > Care to explain the logic behind this? Because it is really beyond my
> > understanding.
>
> No, I don't. Your attitude is too antagonistic.
I don't think there is anything antagonisti
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > wasteful to what?
>
> When I create updates in the future should I make them hundreds of lines
> long like I'm in detention at school, too? I don't like resulting to
> sarcasm, b
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > cobbler-2.0.11-1.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-5680)
> > Boot server configurator
> > ---
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:38 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Starting with the current F14 deltarpm src rpm, I used rpmbuild to build
> binary
> rpms that use the new F15 xz compression. These have the same EVR as the
> standard F14 binary rpms but require liblzma.so.5 instead of liblzma.so.0. In
>
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:34 +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> >
> > Absolutely. Please do improve the page. ;)
>
> Done.
>
> >
> >> IMHO there are three problems:
> >> 1. keys needs to be imported per distro version
> >> 2. "yum clean all" can not be followe
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:59 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:03 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > When running "yum --skip-broken update" and getting this message (currently
> > in
> > Rawhide), should it always be considered a bug and reported?
>
> Depends what you mean. I
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:01:17 -0500
> seth vidal wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 09:35 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > Updating python on x86_64 tries to pull in 32-bit packages
> > > (including one i3
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 09:35 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Updating python on x86_64 tries to pull in 32-bit packages (including
> one i386):
>
> [r...@localhost ~]# yum update python
> Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit,
> security
> Adding en_US to language list
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:54 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:09:30PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 04:32:02 pm Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > This is from a changelog of yum-3.2.28-16.fc15:
> > > *
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
>
but is it broken LESS or broken MORE?
Zing!
sorry, couldn't resist.
-sv
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.f
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:21 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > > > *
> > > > https://fedo
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > *
> > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
> > Shouldn't Rawhide always st
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:15 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> > Actually I misspoke it's gtk2 that was changed not glib2. So I
> > wonder if this is glib2 related at all since these packages fix the
> > problem.
>
> are you sure you didn't
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:54 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> sudo egrep 'pidgin|libpurple' /var/log/yum.log
> Aug 07 09:41:32 Installed: pidgin-2.7.2-1.fc14.i686
> Aug 13 07:14:40 Updated: libpurple-2.7.3-1.fc14.i686
> Aug 13 07:15:05 Updated: pidgin-2.7.3-1.fc14.i686
> Sep 22 16:22:00 Installed: li
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:38 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> I runned because of curiosity reasons the command
>
> yum distro-sync,
>
> and this command downgraded the installed pidgin.i686 0:2.7.3-1.fc14 and
> libpurple.i686 0:2.7.3-1.fc14 to
> pidgin.i686 0:2.7.2-1.fc14 and libpurple.i686 0:2.7.
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:45 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 20/09/10 14:16, seth vidal wrote:
> > repomanage -o /var/lib/yum/plugins/local | xargs rm -f
>
> Could this be added as a start up script?
> in /etc/rc.local
up to you, but there's no reason it couldn't be.
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:22 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 03:16 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >> On 09/15/2010 08:04 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >>> What plugins do you have installed? I only get:
&g
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > In the yum.log I see the time on modprobe.conf occurs
> > > in a gap in the yum updates:
> > >
> > > Aug 25 19:37:56 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek-1.3.1-1.fc14.x86_64
> > > Aug 25 20:02:56 Updated: libgcc-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64
> >
> > The f
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/15/2010 08:04 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> > What plugins do you have installed? I only get:
> >
> > # pwd
> > /var/lib/yum
> > # du -hs *
> > 1.2Mhistory
> > 0 rpmdb-indexes
> > 4.0Kuuid
> > 9.0Myumdb
> >
>
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:51 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:41 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> > > since the current justification for having stable releases at all
> > > is 'to handle upgrade cases we can't handle with yum'
> >
> > What about installation from media such
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:24 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
>
> Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
> I added the i686 libs - I did not do it right ...
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 23:18 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> Sorry everyone, time to vent.
>
> Bah. This is why I just blocked kernel updates in the first place.
> Tried updating now things are worse due to a bad combination of
> Fedora policy multiplied by my own stupidity. I KNEW you were suppo
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 10:07 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> I tried to run virt-manager as a regular user on a machine that does not
> have it installed.
>
> $ virt-manager
> Command not found.
> * Cancelling.. The transaction failed: internal-error, The backend
> exited unexpectedly. This is
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:36 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> I disagree, there really is only so much we as an internet based
> community can do to help the users and publicly providing the
> documentation in multiple outlets is about as good as it gets. I don't
> have everyone's phone number who downl
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 23:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> 1-updated F13/KDE system this AM.
>
> 2-cloned the F13 partition to another partition
>
> 3-changed the clone's UUID
>
> 4-adjusted the clone's grub.conf & fstab, then booted it
>
> 5-rpm -Uvh fedora-release-14-0.7.noarch.rpm
>
> 6-yum up
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:44 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> XFCE
> Although Yum updated to F14-Br, it stayed with py2.6
> Had to use rpm\yum\apt to get a full working py2.7 system.
>
> If enough interest I cut put it up somewhere.
>
I'm curious what the process looked like that required the use of
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 10:24 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AJ" == Adam Jackson writes:
>
> AJ> Do people really not do VNC installs?
>
> Since everyone else is chiming in... I have never done anything other
> than VNC installs. I'm not even sure what a regular install looks like.
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 08:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 09:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > > I'd really rather not, it's still necessary in quite a lot of cases. My
> > > laptop, fr'instance, where intel or nouveau (or both, depending which
> > > graphics adapter you
39 matches
Mail list logo
