On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to
>> show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed:
>> manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 requires l
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had
>> > reported suspend is
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've spent most of yesterday rebuilding things against gtk2, and
> downgrading packages that needed it, so there is now a big update that
> brings the gnome in f14 onto the 2.32 track. This update should fix most
> of the 'mixed gt
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:13 AM, He Rui wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 14:08 +0800, He Rui wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso
>> (probably in other x86_64 images as well):
>>
>> Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mo
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Greetings Testers,
>
> F-14 Alpha TC2 is being posted for testing:
>
> * http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC2/
>
> It's still synchronizing right now, but should be fully available very
> soon. This one actually works!
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Adam Huffman wrote:
> I've entered bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620202 as
> I can no longer boot Fedora on my laptop, after finding a LUKS error
> with the F14 kernel.
>
> Not a big problem for me as there's nothing significant stored on the
> lap
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The same problem also exists in F12 x86_64. Are broken dependencies in
> updates-testing normally ignored?
There was an issue with a bodhi push which caused this problem. celt
was never meant to be pushed (it was removed long before a push
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:50:01 +0100, pbrobinson wrote:
>
>> > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>> >
>> > ==
>> > The results in this
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ===
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 20:31 +0200, birger wrote:
>> The claim i saw was that they had chosen to redesign the 64 bit flash
>> completely.
>>
>> Given that windows seems to be quickly abandoning 32 bit support
>> (first on servers) a completel
10 matches
Mail list logo
