Re: Release criteria: virtualization tweak

2011-09-08 Thread agraham
On 09/08/2011 08:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:42 +0100, agraham wrote: > >>> It's intentionally ambiguous: I try to write the criteria as generically >>> as possible. This ensures we don't have to rewrite them just because we >>

Re: Release criteria: virtualization tweak

2011-09-08 Thread agraham
On 09/08/2011 07:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:19 +0100, agraham wrote: > >>> I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer. >>> Any better ideas? >> >> Suggestions: >> >> A Fedora rel

Re: Release criteria: virtualization tweak

2011-09-08 Thread agraham
On 09/08/2011 02:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the > Beta virt criterion: > > "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation > where the virtual host is running the same release (using Fedora's > current p

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

2011-07-21 Thread agraham
On 07/21/2011 10:58 AM, Jan Wildeboer wrote: > On 07/21/2011 11:26 AM, agraham wrote: > > Replying here only once, this is not content for test@ IMHO > >> I disagree with the propaganda pumped out by RH et al about Fedora being >> a only test bed for RHEL. > > I don&#

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

2011-07-21 Thread agraham
On 07/21/2011 12:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote: >> >> >> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that >> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years >> (http://fedoraproject.org

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

2011-07-21 Thread agraham
On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or >> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable" >> are greyed out. >> >> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server >>

Re: Instalatron: Anaconda testing framework

2011-07-20 Thread agraham
On 07/19/2011 04:49 PM, Sergio Rubio wrote: > Greetings! > > Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using > this one instead). > > Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html > > In a nutshell,

Re: F15: won't boot; won't give command shell

2011-07-07 Thread agraham
On 07/05/2011 11:39 PM, sean darcy wrote: > but what am I looking for?? Probably the mount of free space (or lack of). -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #207: Reveiw Security Lab spin validation matrix

2011-06-25 Thread agraham
On 06/25/2011 05:52 AM, Fedora QA wrote: > #207: Reveiw Security Lab spin validation matrix > -+-- > Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane > Type: task | Status: new > Priority: major

Re: Sipwitch - Anyone got this working - build failed

2010-07-25 Thread agraham
On 06/09/2010 11:48 PM, agraham wrote: > Hi all, > > I thought I'd give Sip Witch a go but I'm have problems making any > calls, my set up is as follows: > > Single segment LAN, with no firewalls, the main host runs sipw in the > foreground so I can see the messages