On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:00:51PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 12:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries
> > exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f-
> >
Hi,
in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries
exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f-e-k
requests, for example to 100. For this you need to change
"limit": 1000
to
"limit": 100
Kind Regards
Till
__
Hi,
if fedora-easy-karma fails with an error message saying "You must
provide a captcha_key" it should help to remove the file
~/.fedora/openidbaseclient-sessions.cache
This will also log you out from other Fedora Web apps that you
access with command-line tools, I suppose. The bug report is her
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:00:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yes, it uses a self-signed certificate. This is fairly common for
> staging/development deployments of Fedora stuff.
Actually there is a proper certificate for staging systems that are in
the *.stg.fedoraproject.org domain, see fo
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:23:37AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > TL;DR: If you host/manage a meeting in a Fedora channel
> > > (#fedora-meeting, #fedora-meeting-1, #fedora-meeting-2), please add it
> > > to Fedocal and the Wiki at:
> > >
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:04:56AM -0500, fla...@dailybrood.com wrote:
> For me, step 2 in Fedora Easy Karma instructions which reads "Run
> fedora-cert", wasn't immediately clear without further explanation
> or an example .i.e. fedora-cert --username=flashl.
here fedora-cert asks for a username,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:21:02PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It got +3 karma and hit the default autopush threshold. Doesn't seem
> terrible, since this is a pretty subtle bug and critpath testing is
> supposed to catch critpath failures, which this is not.
>
> The update could get squelche
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:07:19AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 09:07 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:58:44PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 11:09 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > &
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:58:44PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 11:09 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > If for example all Bugzilla notification mails are screened for changes
> > in the whiteboard field, it would be enough for someone to add it
> > proper
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:38:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 01:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless it seems to be easy to workaround, for example by using the
> > whiteboard as an additional way to propose blocker/NTH bugs. It should
>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:34:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, there's a lot of stuff to Bugzilla which is local site
> configuration, and there _are_ cases where the configuration of RH
> Bugzilla is compromised by having to work for both RHEL and Fedora.
>
> To give an example I've bee
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:13:05PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Yeah with regards to Bugzilla, our infrastructure team really ought
> to be maintaining our own private instance of it. If it continues to
> be run by RH engineering ops limiting us by some RHEL Customer rules
> and policie
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:29:12PM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> I was more thinking of if is there a way for Bodhi to see a package has been
> pushed to testing, and then notify a list of people who specifically have
> expressed interest in the package.
You can use RSS feeds for this, for exa
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 08:24:36PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 05/08/10 20:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > I keep seeing this update, but my f12 test box doesn't have any
> > encrypted fs'es. ;(
> >
> > I can do some manual testing with a crypt loop fs. ;)
> Would it be ok to test with an F12 G
Hiyas,
an update of mine for Fedora 12 needs proventester approval:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cryptsetup-luks-1.1.3-1.fc12,libHX-3.4-1.fc12,pam_mount-2.4-2.fc12
It did not get any karma for a month, even though the critical path
component (cryptsetup-luks) is afaik installed on ever
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:05:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 22:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Yes, but what exactly do you want to have? If you do not want to test
> > updates for a certain package ever, just remove the package from the
>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:52:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 15:35 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> > Adam and Community ;
> > Just a comment about your latest request. I usually run yum update
> > --enable-repo=updates-testing and then fedora-easy-karma to see what
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:16:12PM -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> 2. Open the VM with the GUI tool and perform System - Shutdown - Restart
>
> SYSTEM MUST REBOOT WITHOUT ERROR OR AVC DENIAL **
> In case of an error or avc denial -- report -1 karma against the
> offending package
18 matches
Mail list logo
