Introducing the New QA Dashboard: Gain Insights into the Fedora QA Community

2023-07-09 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
Dear Fedora Community, The Fedora QA team is excited to announce the launch of our brand new QA Dashboard for the Fedora QA community! This dashboard has been designed to provide you with valuable insights into what is happening in the Fedora QA space, helping us all work together more efficiently

Re: Spreading test responsibilities to other teams

2022-03-28 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
Hi Ben, Thanks for starting the discussion. I agree with the intent. This has been a topic of discussion within the Fedora QA team for a while now and we have made some efforts to engage SIGs early in the cycle. As far as the question of when the testing should be a focus from respective SIGs? I

Fwd: Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing.

2022-01-24 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
-- Forwarded message - From: Daniel Walsh Date: Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:46 PM Subject: Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing. To: Development discussions related to Fedora , We would love to have people play with this and test it out. Note: this release has breaking cha

Re: Questions about the testing process

2021-06-20 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
ives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Sudhir Dharanendraiah Senior manager, FEDORA QE, Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> TRIED AND PE

Re: Fedora Council report

2015-05-20 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Original Message - | From: "Kamil Paral" | To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" | Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 6:27:26 PM | Subject: Re: Fedora Council report | | > Hi, folks! So I'm following up again on the request from the Council | > that we send someone to r

Re: Self Introduction

2015-05-20 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Original Message - | From: "Glen Rundblom" | To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org | Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:12:08 AM | Subject: Self Introduction | | Hello, I would like to introduce myself. My name is Glen and I am | currently working on the Docs team. I am looking for ways to contr

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-02 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2015-03-02 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Original Message - | From: "Kamil Paral" | To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org | Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 6:15:24 PM | Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-02 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting | | > If you have any other topic ideas, please reply to this mail and we'll | > add them in th

Re: Release criteria notes

2015-02-06 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Kickstart Delivery > > Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a >supported > delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or do we still >actively test > using a diskette for ks delivery? Hum, not sure. I know I have

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-01-05 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2015-01-05 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Adam Williamson wrote: | On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 22:47 +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote: | > On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: | > > In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release it | > > won't be a blocker for the next release

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-01-05 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2015-01-05 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release it won't be a blocker for the next release either - remember Fedora doesn't use the RHEL system where bugs can be dropped as blockers for time reasons, in the Fedora system blockers are su

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-01-05 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2015-01-05 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
On 01/05/2015 07:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: roshi and I had a quick chat about the idea of starting up blocker bug review for the F22 cycle this week, in the interests of reducing the number of long meetings later in the cycle by starting earlier - so let's see what folks think of that. I do

Re: Fedora 21 Final test coverage

2014-11-07 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Original Message - | From: "Adam Williamson" | To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, sdhar...@redhat.com | Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 12:48:40 AM | Subject: Fedora 21 Final test coverage | | Hi, folks! Just taking a look through testcase_stats, some tests that | have never or rarely

Re: Oh no! Something has gone wrong.

2011-08-29 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
On 08/29/2011 07:02 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:44:54 +0530, SD (Sudhir) wrote: > >>> Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it. >>> >>> Now it's hitting me badly everytime I boot F16 Alpha. Sometimes the >>> second login attempt succeeds, sometimes it doesn't

Re: Oh no! Something has gone wrong.

2011-08-28 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
On 08/29/2011 01:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it. Now it's hitting me badly everytime I boot F16 Alpha. Sometimes the second login attempt succeeds, sometimes it doesn't and needs a third attempt. gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64 Where do I

New BugZapper Introduction

2011-07-17 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
Hello Folks, I'm very excited to be part of the Fedora Bug Zappers team. I use a lot of Fedora and Red Hat and I'm very much looking forward to contribute to Fedora. Below is the brief introduction about myself. My name is Sudhir and I'm from India (GMT +5:30). Being in the Quality team for o