On 04/06/2012 11:27 AM, John Dulaney wrote:
This has nothing to do with QA.
Seconded.
George, just be happy they didn't go with the first choice: "Vivid
animated penis."
Happy Good Friday. :)
-Scott
p.s. extra points if you recognize the Usenet reference...
--
test mailing list
test@li
On 05/31/2011 12:18 PM, Pasha R wrote:
>
> So, lets tackle the screensaver issue again. As I understand from
> your answer there are currently no plans to return screensavers other
> than blank screen - it is not a temporary matter of lack of resources.
> I would like to see this decision reversed
On 05/29/2011 11:24 PM, Pasha R wrote:
> May be instead of rushing to release Gnome 3 before
> it can provide not only nice-looking, but also functional DE, they
> could stop, catch their breath and complete all these missing
> features.
It would be most helpful if someone could post a link, or ad
"Jason D. Clinton" wrote:
>It's already been explained to you that it hasn't been replaced. The
>old and new interfaces are co-deployed intentionally.
Alas, this turns out not to be the case. My Gnome 2 panel has extensive
customizations, none of which appear in Gnome 3...fallback mode or
o
Adam Williamson wrote:
>The alternative was not having the Shut Down option at all, so be
>careful what you wish for...=)
I know you're kidding, sir, because such examples of false dichotomies are
clearly logical fallacies...and we know those never appear on Fedora mailing
lists... ;-)
Seri
On 04/08/2011 01:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> After upgrading to a 3 terabyte hard drive, I reinstalled
> Fedora 14 and can't get Sendmail to listen on the usual
> network interfaces. The usual trick of commenting out
> the 127. line no longer was sufficient. I had to
> ecplicitly
On 10/15/2010 01:22 PM, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>
> On the kernel line, "rdblacklist=nouveau". Also don't forget
> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf also. I usually do both
If you do only the latter, you also may need to run something like this:
# dracut -f /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -
On 09/02/2010 11:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> There's no guarantee the bug will get closed even if the problem is
> fixed, unless someone else has the same hardware as you and is testing.
> A fix may come down from upstream without being recognized specifically
> as a fix for this particular
