I've looked at the RPM spec file for mingw-crt in Fedora 41 and now
believe the build-time configuration is incorrect.
I've raised a bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314420
Cheers,
Ron
--
___
test mailing list -- test@lists
Using GNOME Shell on Wayland in Fedora 41 with Hicolor icons:
- GNOME Terminal displays the 'missing icon' icon instead of
'+' and '-'.
Using GNOME Shell Classic on Wayland in Fedora 41 with either
Hicolor or Adwaita icons:
- Icecat has the 'unknown app' icon in the Window List. (Actually,
I've tried using the mingw-w64 toolchain to build a Windows application
on Fedora 41. Following my usual practice I installed mingw64-gcc and
used the x86_64-w64-mingw32 toolchain to cross-compile.
I was disappointed to find that the resulting binary required UCRT. In
fact, apart from timestamps
Ed Greshko wrote:
>2. User creation is delayed until first boot...
...and when the user is created and you click through the installer
you're logged in to the desktop as that user.
I want to perform some additional configuration before letting users
log in to the desktop. The only way I've foun
Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
>> I really don't much like dnf: its default behaviour seems off compared
>> to yum and I have less trust in it than I did yum.
>
>It was just a bug, in a pre-release piece of software.
My o
Lukas Brabec wrote:
>It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it
>didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all
>dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now.
Thanks for the hint. Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2 resulted
in 'dnf upda
I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were
483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today.
I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular.
However, 'dnf update' and 'dnf --best update' both report there's nothing
to do.
I tried to install using the F18 Beta TC7 Live CD, but couldn't find
any way to specify that the bootloader should go onto the root
partition rather than the MBR. Is this possible? It used to be.
I see someone has already raised a bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=87282
Rob Healey wrote:
>Is there anyway that you plan to submit this to Fedora, and if so, I would
>like to suggest one improvement!
I don't plan to submit it. I'm not a Fedora contributor, just a grumpy
old user who doesn't know when to stop hacking on things he doesn't
understand. I have made an RP
Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
>I see that you were able to activate System Tools. This menu entry
>does not appear in the fallback mode. It does appear in alacarte (Menu
>editor), along with a preferences menu. But there are many items in the
>preferences menu that are not available in Fallback mode.
I've written a few extensions to make the GNOME Shell user experience a
bit more like that of GNOME 2.
Move the clock towards the right of the panel;
Place launchers for favourite applications on the panel;
Replace the Activities button with an Applications menu;
Disable dynamic wor
11 matches
Mail list logo
