+1 looks great.
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 08:41 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in "future of official optical media support in Fedora"
> thread in devel list [1], we agreed to decrease the importance and
> testing of optical media support for Fedora release composes, and
> block on
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
Have a nice day,
Petr Schindler, Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fed
On Út, 2016-04-12 at 05:34 -0400, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> As we discussed in the meeting yesterday,I have listed test cases of
> the upcoming Fedora Test Day on Fedora Media Writer on this wiki[1].
> Let me know if you have any feedbacks and inputs.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.
Hi,
I would like to inform you that tomorrow (2016-03-17) is going to be a
test
day focusing on integration of Qt applications in Fedora Workstation
(Gnome
shell). There are two packages/components making Qt applications more
integrated into Gnome world. The first one is adwaita-qt, which is a
Stephen Gallagher píše v Čt 19. 11. 2015 v 15:50 -0500:
> On 11/18/2015 07:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > With either approach, the basic goal is to make it more feasible
> > to keep an eye on each of the different categories of 'release
> > blocker' bugs; right now we have solid processes in
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:20 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:39:57 -0400
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
> > FYI, using the f23 alpha iso:
> > Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-23_Alpha.isoFedora-Server-DVD-i386
> > -23_Alpha.iso
> >
> > gives a panic message that looks very much like the one sho
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 17:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 12:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hi, folks!
> > >
> > > We've found an issue in Fedora 23 Beta testing which seems to
> > > affect
> > > AMD CP
ould also recommend to follow our callendar
for upcoming events (such as test days and meetings) - [2].
If you have some question you can ask them by irc (freenode - #fedora
-qa) or here on the mailing list. One more time - welcome to the team
and enjoy making fedora better.
With bes
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing.
Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6166#comment:14. Please see
the following pages for download links and testing instructions.
Fedora 22 Final Release Compose 1 (RC1) is now available for testing.
Please help us complete as much of the validation testing as we can!
This is first release compose so everything should be tested properly.
Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-e
lp us with testing, you can visit test
day page [1], where you will find all the needed information, test
cases and place to save your results.
You can also find someone to help you on irc channel #fedora-test-day
on freenode.
Best regards
Petr Schindler, Fedora QA
[0] https://fedoraprojec
On Út, 2015-04-14 at 11:54 +0530, Ashutosh Bhakare wrote:
> hi All
>
>
> My name is Ashutosh Bhakare; I am currently Trainer / Owner @ Red Hat
> Authorised Training Institute located in Aurangabad MS India.
>
> I am eager to work with QA team; I am having 14+ years experience in
> C C
> ++, Ja
On Po, 2015-04-13 at 16:38 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Kalev Lember gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 4) Run 'fedora-easy-karma' daily, and give -1 karma to updates that
> > regress anything and +1 karma to those that don't
>
> Chances are f-e-k won't work. See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
The Fedora Project holds regular Test Days to help put releases or
individual components through their paces. Tomorrow, Fedora’s Test Day
will focus on Cockpit.
Cockpit is a modern lightweight server admin interface:
http://cockpit-project.org/
Cockpit comes by default in Fedora Server 22.
Wh
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 7 (TC7)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:11 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testin
NOTE: There are no cloud images in TC5 due to some issue with anaconda
and kickstart parsing.
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#c
On Čt, 2014-08-07 at 11:26 -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Mike,
> > sorry for late response. I went through testcases you wrote and it looks
> > fine to me, we should use them in matri
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review-6
==
Meeting started by pschindl at 16:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-08-13/f21-blocker-review.2014-
# F21 Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2014-08-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today
there are 6 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full
list can be
Mike Ruckman píše v Čt 17. 07. 2014 v 11:29 -0600:
> Greetings Testers!
>
> I've been working on some testcases and general wiki work for the Cloud
> SIG [0]. While I was doing this I created a few testcases and edited a
> couple of our others. I'd like to these get reviewed and placed on the
> m
thing what could be interpreted as swastika. Can someone draw it
and send a picture? I think that this thread is totally insane and sad.
But it is probably because people always tend to see things they don't
like everywhere (like conspiracies).
Petr Schindler
>
> ... Just to be safe, w
#fedora-blocker-review: f20final-blocker-review-2
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-20/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-20-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fed
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-7
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-06/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-06-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
Hi testers.
There are updates which needs your attention. They needs to be pushed to
the stable, so please test them and add karma.
* solves blocker bug:
1.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-16308/kde-settings-20-1.fc20,schroedinger-cat-kde-theme-18.91.6-2.fc20,heisenbug-kde-the
On Po, 2013-01-21 at 04:48 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > The proposal is this:
> >
> > fXXalpha
> > fXXalpha-freezebreak
> > fXXbeta
> > fXXbeta-freezebreak
> > fXXfinal
> > fXXfinal-freezebreak
> >
> > acceptedblocker
> > acceptedfb
>
> Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
>
> 1. Do
me any suggestions or objections you have.
Thank you
Petr Schindler
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschindl/Draft_QA_Testcase_Repository_completeness
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Út, 2012-12-04 at 10:02 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 17:28 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Obsolete TCs:
> > * Hardware and BIOS RAID TCs - Do we support those now?
>
> Yes. Why would they be obsolete?
>
> >
Final release criteria:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria
I went through all criteria and connect them to test cases. I found
following problems:
We don't have TCs for:
* The release live images must properly support mounting and using a
persistent storage overlay fo
Hi,
There is a link to 'Shortcut Settings' in 'Regional & Language'->'Input
Sources'. You can set up the shortcut for switching to next source (and
previous).
On Po, 2012-12-03 at 13:46 +0200, Pasha R wrote:
> I'm trying to set up keyboard layout switching in F18 beta. I addeds
> needed layouts i
On Út, 2012-09-11 at 14:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 10:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 2012-09-06 6:54, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> we should amend the beta criterion:
> > >>
> > &g
On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 10:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 0:58, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that require LVM and encryption in alpha phase is quite too
> > early. It isn't feature which should slow down the alpha release. I
> &
On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 10:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 6:54, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> we should amend the beta criterion:
> >>
> >> 'At the package installation stage, the install should show no
> >> uncategorized package groups'
> >>
> >> There should be something li
On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 09:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 0:59, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Because of changes in package set selection in new anaconda, I
> >> propose
> >> to amend the alpha criterion:
> >>
> >> 'The installer must be able to complete package installation
On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 08:45 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 07:21 AM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Please, let me know if you have some suggestions or objections.
>
> Please keep it
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete package install
is criterion is still
applicable.
If you have any suggestions or objection send them to the list.
Regards
Petr Schindler
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ut
encryption or using LVM'
If you have some suggestions or objection send them to the list.
Regards
Petr Schindler
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
all the default desktop for each
supported installation method (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
I chose default desktop because in f17 every installation method had it
as default package set.
Please, let me know if you have some suggestions or objections.
Regards
Petr Schindler
--
te
Hi,
On Po, 2012-09-03 at 19:19 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release.
>
> 1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice
We already have criteria, which demands usable partitioning. In
different phases we want different feat
I've filled the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849152
This bug shows, how bad could it be, when you can't choose custom
packages. It is impossible to install system with GNOME without this
feature now.
Hopefully no more dependency problems will appear. And this won't be
needed a
Hi,
there is missing boot parameter, so you won't be able to boot TC1. You
can add 'root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora\x2018-Alpha-TC1\x20x86_64' to boot
line to boot this iso.
But, there is broken anaconda, so you won't be able to run install. I
pinged anaconda team about the problem, so they are now work
Hi,
there is missing root parameter on boot line. If you add
'root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora\x2018-Alpha-TC1\x20x86_64' to boot line, you
will be able to boot. But it won't help you much, there is a problem
within anaconda, which should be fixed, so this TC is not working.
On Po, 2012-08-13 at 14:18 +0
Hi,
I went ahead and created template for f18 install results [1]. Do we
have some page with test plan for f18? There are some links to it, but
page doesn't exist.
I've also copied pages for results and set up links, so you can now use
these links [2], [3], [4] for your results.
I think that we
Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> > Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
> >
> > 'The installer must be able to complete an installation us
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> > Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
> >
> > 'The rescue mode of the
the discussion within this threads will lead to some action - for me it
would be better to wait, but it looks like we could wait another six
month.
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:55 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] an
't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
Petr Schindler
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewInstallerUI
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
Petr Schindler
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewInstallerUI
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
g to Chris): (This feature) will not be supported for this
release,
but will be back for F19. There's simply not the time to do this.
Please, if you have some suggestions or notes reply to this thread. If
there won't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
tions'
Reason (according to Chris): There's been no work done on rescue mode
and it is highly unlikely that it does anything at all right now.
Please, if you have some suggestions or notes reply to this thread. If
there won't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
emoved for this
release,
given that there will be no text mode interface temporarily.
Please, if you have some suggestions or notes reply to this thread. If
there won't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
Petr Schindler
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Featur
's been no work done on rescue mode
and it is highly unlikely that it does anything at all right now.
Please, if you have some suggestions or notes reply to this thread. If
there won't be any objections I'll make changes during next week.
Petr Schindler
[1] https://fedora
On So, 2012-07-07 at 09:15 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 07:10 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > I attempted installation using Fedora-20120703-x86_64-916dfe7-netinst.iso
> > and
> > found that it only allows choosing one desktop. I normally install both
> > Gnome
> > and KDE
> As two people voted for it, patch. Beta proposal is unchanged. For
> Alpha, instead of adding a new criterion, the existing criterion is
> simply modified to:
>
> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
On Pá, 2012-06-08 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
> > those
> > architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install
> > media
> > when written
On Út, 2012-04-10 at 10:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 09:49 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Recently we found out that we don't have any criterion for PXE boot. Also
> > F17 anaconda separated its root image from initrd.img, adding new ways
> > where things can break. In
On Út, 2012-03-13 at 22:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Ack! Since we had a solid consensus on the meeting I think we should
> just go ahead and put this in the Beta criteria.
The new criterion is right on the place. So from now, non-functional
serial console interface is beta (and final) b
it is doable, I would prefer having it in Beta.
>
> I think that's pretty strong reasoning, and it makes me lean towards
> Beta as well.
Hi,
because no one had objections against it and we decided on blocker bug
meeting, that serial console is blocker, I propose to add criterion:
iterion? I asked anaconda team for suggestion and here is their
answer [2]. What is your opinion?
[1] http://goo.gl/921Vo
[2]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-February/msg00144.html
On Po, 2012-02-13 at 14:11 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because nobody had any objection
On Pá, 2012-03-02 at 08:41 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Hi,
> > it works for me. I use Gnome shell and dropbox icon is in the tray as
> > usually. Try to run 'dropbox running; echo $?' if it writes out '0' the
> > dropbox isn&
On Čt, 2012-03-01 at 11:48 -0800, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
> anybody have any luck with dropbox on F17 x86_64? It's not showing up in
> the panel, but is in the applications->internet menu. When clicked, it
> tries to install, but fails.
>
> -benjamin
Hi,
it works for me. I use Gnome shell and
I've removed the criterion from [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:20 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> It looks like better idea to drop criterion as this option is
> obsolete.
> So, I propose to remove criterion
>
I've added new criterion to beta release criteria. Tha alpha criterion
has already been there (I proposed it in another thread). You can find
changes here [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Beta_Release_Criteria
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:51 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
&
This package is obsolete. Maintainer of Revisor hasn't worked on it for
year and lot of things changed since then. This package should be
removed from repositories.
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:27 -0600, kevin martin wrote:
> Loks like you don't have the 32 bit version of anaconda installed and
> that
I've added test case [1] to [2].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Services_start
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_results_template
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:23 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > From: "Adam Williamson"
> > To: "F
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:24 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Thank you for suggestions on this. I would require only methods for
> > which we have test case [1] [2] and from alpha [3]. So I propose
> beta
> > criterion:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to use an [[Anaconda/Updates|installer
>
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 12:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:42 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the
> issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode."
> >
> > Debug mode is intended to be used by dev
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 12:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> > > without SELinux"
> > >
> > > There is no test case for this now.
> > >
> > > I have one note on th
Anaconda team wants to support upgrading by text interface [1], so
everything is fine and no changes have to be done here.
[1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-February/msg00032.html
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:56 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose to change rele
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:23 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> If you have some objection on this one, please, let me know till
> tomorrow, otherwise if there are no suggestions I'll make changes.
I've made changes. I've added new alpha and final release criterion to
[1]
I've added it to alpha criteria [1]. If this feature isn't working now,
we should test it and propose new blocker bug.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_Release_Criteria
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 09:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 14:45 +0100, P
Because there was no objections, I've added new final criterion to [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 05:28 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > From: "Adam Williamson"
> > To: "For testing and qual
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:26 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new alpha criterion:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to download and apply updates.img file
> > using a HTTP url and use it&
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:21 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Test case [1] is associated with alpha release level in [2]. I propose to
> > change it to beta level, where is criterion: "The installer must be able to
&
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:47 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:33 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose to remove [1] test case as we don't need it anymore. EFI
> > booting is handled by regular image.
> >
> > [1
at 09:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
>
> > > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > >
2012-02-01 at 08:47 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:05 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > >
> > >> > We made this Beta not Alpha in the criteria on purpose, specifical
If you have some objection on this one, please, let me know till
tomorrow, otherwise if there are no suggestions I'll make changes.
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:40 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:
9:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:39 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new final criterion:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> > supported interfaces"
> >
> > Serial p
Hi all,
I propose new test case [1]. This test case checks, whether all required
packages are in the release repository and on install media.
This test case should be in final release level. We have these three
final criteria [2]:
'A "spin-kickstarts" package which contains the exact kickstart f
I propose to change release level of [1] [2] from beta to non-blocking
(leave it blank). There is a thread [3] anaconda-devel list, but nobody
has replied. I hope that someone from anaconda will react on this
proposal. If text upgrade will be supported in f17, there is a bug from
last release [3] w
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:39 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new final criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> supported interfaces"
>
> Serial port is
using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces", so it should
work.
Regards
Petr Schindler
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:48 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
>
> > OK, so test case should stay in alpha and new criterion should be in
> > alpha too. I propose to drop the part about embedded checksum (that
> >
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:52:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Change of release level of Mediakit ISO Size test case
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 20:40 +,
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:51:56 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for installation with minimal set of packages
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:42:30 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for updates.img using
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:28 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> &
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:51:16 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for Checksum
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:02 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > P
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:50:46 AM
> Subject: Re: New test case for testing if services start properly
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:37 -0500, Petr Schindl
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:47:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for enhancement of criterion
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:35 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:46:45 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for reporting failure of installer and accessing
> debug mode
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:36:38 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for Memory test
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:23 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> &g
I propose new test cases [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
"All services in a default install must start properly"
We don't have test case for this right now.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschindl/Draft_QA_Testcase_Services_start
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
"The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux"
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work
now. I filled bug
I propose to enhance alpha criterion
"The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with appropriate
information included"
to
"The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, remote system and
local disk, with appopriate information included"
Especially saving failures
I propose to remove [1] test case as we don't need it anymore. EFI booting is
handled by regular image.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I propose final criterion:
"The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
installer must be also able to access debug mode."
We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_
I propose new beta criterion:
"The installer must be able to use updates.img obtained by any supported way"
I think, that this should be at criteria too. There are test cases which uses
this feature - [1], [2]
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_installatio
I propose new alpha criterion:
"The installer must be able to download and apply updates.img file using a HTTP
url and use it"
We have test cases for this [1], but no criterion. I think it's pretty
importing -> alpha.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_URL
I propose new beta criterion:
"The installer must be able to install system with minimal usable set of
packages."
There is test case [1] associated with alpha, I'd change it to beta release
level.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Minimal_Package_Install
--
test ma
I propose new final criterion:
"The installer must be able to run memory test."
This feature is very useful and should work. We have test case for this yet
[1]. I'd move it to final release level.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Memtest86
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
